Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9.2

Hi Aleks, On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:02:56PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > > Very likely, yes. If you want to inspect the body you simply have to > > enable "option http-buffer-request" so that haproxy waits for the body > > before executing rules. From there, indeed you can pass whatever Lua

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9.2

Hi Willy. Am 17.01.2019 um 04:25 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > Hi Aleks, > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:52:12PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: >> For service routing are the standard haproxy content routing options possible >> (path, header, ...) , right? > > Yes absolutely. > >> If someone want to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9.2

Hi Aleks, On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:52:12PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > For service routing are the standard haproxy content routing options possible > (path, header, ...) , right? Yes absolutely. > If someone want to route based on grpc content he can use lua with body > content >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9.2

Hi. Am 16.01.2019 um 19:02 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > Hi, > > HAProxy 1.9.2 was released on 2019/01/16. It added 58 new commits > after version 1.9.1. > > It addresses a number of lower importance pending issues that were not > yet merged into 1.9.1, one bug in the cache and fixes some

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9.2

Hi, HAProxy 1.9.2 was released on 2019/01/16. It added 58 new commits after version 1.9.1. It addresses a number of lower importance pending issues that were not yet merged into 1.9.1, one bug in the cache and fixes some long-standing limitations that were affecting H2. The highest severity