Hi Manu,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:34:46AM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
> It's ok because this function is inserted upper in the patch.
>
> As said, it's only a revert from 019f9b10 patches for openssl-compat.h.
> From:
> # Functions introduced in OpenSSL 1.1.0 and not yet present in LibreSSL /
Le 25 juil. 2018 à 10:34, Emmanuel Hocdet a écrit :Hi WillyLe 24 juil. 2018 à 18:59, Willy Tarreau a écrit :Hi Manu,On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 06:12:34PM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:Hi Willy,This patch is necessary to build with current BoringSSL (SSL_SESSION is now opa
Hi Willy
> Le 24 juil. 2018 à 18:59, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
>
> Hi Manu,
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 06:12:34PM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
>> Hi Willy,
>>
>> This patch is necessary to build with current BoringSSL (SSL_SESSION is now
>> opaque).
>> BoringSSL correctly matches OpenSSL 1.1.
Hi Manu,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 06:12:34PM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> This patch is necessary to build with current BoringSSL (SSL_SESSION is now
> opaque).
> BoringSSL correctly matches OpenSSL 1.1.0 since 3b2ff028 for haproxy needs.
> The patch revert part of haproxy 019f9b
Hi Willy,
This patch is necessary to build with current BoringSSL (SSL_SESSION is now
opaque).
BoringSSL correctly matches OpenSSL 1.1.0 since 3b2ff028 for haproxy needs.
The patch revert part of haproxy 019f9b10 (openssl-compat.h).
This will not break openssl/libressl compat.
Can you consider i
5 matches
Mail list logo