> Le 18 juin 2018 à 15:54, Thierry Fournier a
> écrit :
>
> I don’t known. In fact it works, so it is not a bug. But, when I use the
> reservation for an ex_data slot, it returns the slot 0, and this slot is
> used for the compatibility layer and can be crush some data. I conclude
> that is a
> On 18 Jun 2018, at 15:38, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
>
>
>> Le 18 juin 2018 à 15:30, Thierry Fournier a
>> écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 18 Jun 2018, at 14:37, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
>>>
Le 18 juin 2018 à 10:43, Thierry Fournier
a écrit :
> On 18 Jun 2018, at
> Le 18 juin 2018 à 15:30, Thierry Fournier a
> écrit :
>
>
>
>> On 18 Jun 2018, at 14:37, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Le 18 juin 2018 à 10:43, Thierry Fournier a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>
On 18 Jun 2018, at 10:33, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 09:44:50P
> On 18 Jun 2018, at 14:37, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 18 juin 2018 à 10:43, Thierry Fournier a
>> écrit :
>>
>>
>>> On 18 Jun 2018, at 10:33, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 09:44:50PM +0200, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org
>>> wrote:
Finally, I got it !
> Le 18 juin 2018 à 10:43, Thierry Fournier a
> écrit :
>
>
>> On 18 Jun 2018, at 10:33, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 09:44:50PM +0200, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org
>> wrote:
>>> Finally, I got it ! It works with luck because we have 1 bug in Haproxy
>>> and 1 error
Hi Thierry, Willy
> Le 18 juin 2018 à 10:43, Thierry Fournier a
> écrit :
>
>
>> On 18 Jun 2018, at 10:33, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 09:44:50PM +0200, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org
>> wrote:
>>> Finally, I got it ! It works with luck because we have 1 bug in Hapro
> On 18 Jun 2018, at 10:33, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 09:44:50PM +0200, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org wrote:
>> Finally, I got it ! It works with luck because we have 1 bug in Haproxy
>> and 1 error (I suppose) in a OpenSSL compatibility layer.
> (...)
>> I join two patch
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 09:44:50PM +0200, thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org wrote:
> Finally, I got it ! It works with luck because we have 1 bug in Haproxy
> and 1 error (I suppose) in a OpenSSL compatibility layer.
(...)
> I join two patch. The first which fix the cipher capture must be
> backported
Finally, I got it ! It works with luck because we have 1 bug in Haproxy
and 1 error (I suppose) in a OpenSSL compatibility layer.
First point is some OpenSSL macro, in the ssl.h file:
#define SSL_set_app_data(s,arg) (SSL_set_ex_data(s,0,(char*)arg))
#define SSL_get_app_data(s) (SSL_get_
9 matches
Mail list logo