more findings
https://travis-ci.org/chipitsine/haproxy-1/jobs/535709949#L1938-L1948
ср, 22 мая 2019 г. в 15:12, Илья Шипицин :
> here's build with patch applied
>
> https://travis-ci.org/chipitsine/haproxy-1/jobs/535709947#L604-L608
>
> ср, 22 мая 2019 г. в 14:43, William Lallemand :
>
>> Hi
here's build with patch applied
https://travis-ci.org/chipitsine/haproxy-1/jobs/535709947#L604-L608
ср, 22 мая 2019 г. в 14:43, William Lallemand :
> Hi Tim,
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> I added 2 new lines in your patch:
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 08:23:22PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> >
Hi Tim,
Sorry for the delay.
I added 2 new lines in your patch:
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 08:23:22PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> +void mworker_free_child(struct mworker_proc *child) {
> + if (child == NULL) return;
> +
Which became:
> +void mworker_free_child(struct mworker_proc *child)
The struct mworker_proc is not uniformly freed everywhere, sometimes leading
to leaks of the `id` string (and possibly the other strings).
Introduce a mworker_free_child function instead of duplicating the freeing
logic everywhere to prevent this kind of issues.
This leak was reported in issue
4 matches
Mail list logo
