On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:19 AM Miroslav Zagorac
wrote:
> On 01/28/2020 12:02 AM, Baptiste wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 7:53 PM William Dauchy
> wrote:
> >
> >> hostname were limited to 62 char, which is not RFC1035 compliant;
> >> - the parsing loop should stop when above max label char
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:02:18AM +0100, Baptiste wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 7:53 PM William Dauchy wrote:
>
> > hostname were limited to 62 char, which is not RFC1035 compliant;
> > - the parsing loop should stop when above max label char
> > - fix len label test where d[i] was wrongly
On 01/28/2020 12:02 AM, Baptiste wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 7:53 PM William Dauchy wrote:
hostname were limited to 62 char, which is not RFC1035 compliant;
- the parsing loop should stop when above max label char
- fix len label test where d[i] was wrongly used
- simplify the whole
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 7:53 PM William Dauchy wrote:
> hostname were limited to 62 char, which is not RFC1035 compliant;
> - the parsing loop should stop when above max label char
> - fix len label test where d[i] was wrongly used
> - simplify the whole function to avoid using two extra char*
William,
Am 26.01.20 um 19:52 schrieb William Dauchy:
> hostname were limited to 62 char, which is not RFC1035 compliant;
> - the parsing loop should stop when above max label char
> - fix len label test where d[i] was wrongly used
> - simplify the whole function to avoid using two extra char*
hostname were limited to 62 char, which is not RFC1035 compliant;
- the parsing loop should stop when above max label char
- fix len label test where d[i] was wrongly used
- simplify the whole function to avoid using two extra char* variable
this should fix github issue #387
Signed-off-by:
6 matches
Mail list logo
