Re: [PATCHES] 3 patches for DNS SRV records

2017-08-22 Thread Baptiste
Hey all, We fixed a few bugs in the DNS SRV records and added support for DNS extension (to announce we can accept a "big" response payload). It is now safer to run HAProxy 1.8-dev with services discovery tools (kubernetes, consul, etc...) and get updates using SRV records. Don't forget to mix

Re: [PATCHES] 3 patches for DNS SRV records

2017-08-11 Thread Baptiste Assmann
Hi Conrad, > first of all: great to see that this is making progress! I am very > excited > about everything related to SRV records and also server-templates. I > tested > a fresh master build with these patches applied, here are my > observations: Thanks a lot for taking time to test and

Re: [PATCHES] 3 patches for DNS SRV records

2017-08-11 Thread Baptiste Assmann
Hi Aleksandar, Thanks for your feedback. > > In one line, we can enable automatic "scalling follow-up" in > > HAProxy. > ... for headless services only, right. Well I think I've already seen my Kubernetes friend distributing IPs even for nodePort deployments. > 8-O. I don't say the word

Re: [PATCHES] 3 patches for DNS SRV records

2017-08-11 Thread Conrad Hoffmann
On 08/11/2017 02:56 PM, Conrad Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > first of all: great to see that this is making progress! I am very excited > about everything related to SRV records and also server-templates. I tested > a fresh master build with these patches applied, here are my observations: > > On

Re: [PATCHES] 3 patches for DNS SRV records

2017-08-11 Thread Conrad Hoffmann
Hi, first of all: great to see that this is making progress! I am very excited about everything related to SRV records and also server-templates. I tested a fresh master build with these patches applied, here are my observations: On 08/11/2017 11:10 AM, Baptiste Assmann wrote: > Hi All > > So,

Re: [PATCHES] 3 patches for DNS SRV records

2017-08-11 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi Baptiste, Baptiste Assmann wrote on 11.08.2017: > Hi All > So, I enabled latest (brilliant) contribution from Olivier into my > Kubernetes cluster and I discovered it did not work as expected. > After digging into the issues, I found 3 bugs directly related to the > way SRV records must be

[PATCHES] 3 patches for DNS SRV records

2017-08-11 Thread Baptiste Assmann
Hi All So, I enabled latest (brilliant) contribution from Olivier into my Kubernetes cluster and I discovered it did not work as expected. After digging into the issues, I found 3 bugs directly related to the way SRV records must be read and processed by HAProxy. It was clearly hard to spot them