Hi all,
Le 31/03/2016 07:23, Baptiste a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Paul Draper wrote:
it's already doable in 1.6
Great. (It seems that the stats socket commands disappeared from the HTML
docs in 1.6.)
It has been moved into a doc/management.txt which is not (yet ?)
parsed b
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Paul Draper wrote:
>> it's already doable in 1.6
>
>
> Great. (It seems that the stats socket commands disappeared from the HTML
> docs in 1.6.)
>
It has been moved into a doc/management.txt which is not (yet ?)
parsed by dconv to produce the HTML output.
Baptist
>
> it's already doable in 1.6
>
Great. (It seems that the stats socket commands disappeared from the HTML
docs in 1.6.)
Though in any case, the server state save/load alone will solve my issue
rather well.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Baptiste wrote:
> > Is it actually possible to change
> Is it actually possible to change server IP addresses via the stats socket,
> or were you just suggesting a change?
it's already doable in 1.6:
set server / addr
I'm working on allowing to change the service port using the same
command (:) but it's more complicated due to the impact on
many o
Hey guys,
I think completely hitless reload is what the end goal should be.
Config changes are not the only benefit, hitless binary upgrade would
be terrific as well :)
This should already work on the BSDs, only in Linux we have that race
condition before close() and we may be able to mimic BSD
>
> you can perform DNS resolution at run time (from my understanding,
> you don't do it now)
Ah, yes, I was using 1.5 and did not know that 1.6 added this.
you can save and apply server states (not the statistics) before
> and after reloads, to avoid the unhealthy server effect
Fantastic.
We
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Paul Draper wrote:
> As I understand it, there seems to no way to add a server to HAProxy without
> incurring significant disruption. Adding a server requires reloading
> configuration. This loses all statistics, all health check information, etc.
> So, for instanc
(The example should have been s3-1.amazonaws.com.)
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Paul Draper wrote:
> As I understand it, there seems to no way to add a server to HAProxy
> without incurring significant disruption. Adding a server requires
> reloading configuration. This loses all statistics
> On 29 Mar 2016, at 18:22, Paul Draper wrote:
>
> As I understand it, there seems to no way to add a server to HAProxy without
> incurring significant disruption. Adding a server requires reloading
> configuration. This loses all statistics, all health check information, etc.
> So, for inst
As I understand it, there seems to no way to add a server to HAProxy
without incurring significant disruption. Adding a server requires
reloading configuration. This loses all statistics, all health check
information, etc. So, for instance, after adding a server, HAProxy will
send traffic to unheal
10 matches
Mail list logo
