On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:10:35PM +0300, Valter Jansons wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:37 PM Julien Pivotto
> wrote:
> > I'm with Lukas on this. 2.1 is a strong release, and we should be
> > grateful for everyone which is using that release, as their feedback is
> > valuable for the
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:37 PM Julien Pivotto wrote:
> I'm with Lukas on this. 2.1 is a strong release, and we should be
> grateful for everyone which is using that release, as their feedback is
> valuable for the building the next releases of HAProxy.
My apologies if the message sounded
On 30 Jul 21:29, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 20:49, Valter Jansons wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 6:44 PM Harris Kaufmann
> > wrote:
> > > my company really needs the next 2.1 release but we want to avoid
> > > deploying a custom, self compiled version.
> >
Hello,
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 20:49, Valter Jansons wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 6:44 PM Harris Kaufmann
> wrote:
> > my company really needs the next 2.1 release but we want to avoid
> > deploying a custom, self compiled version.
> >
> > Is there something I can do to help with the
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 6:44 PM Harris Kaufmann wrote:
> my company really needs the next 2.1 release but we want to avoid
> deploying a custom, self compiled version.
>
> Is there something I can do to help with the release? I guess there
> are no blocking issues left?
For mission-critical
Hi,
my company really needs the next 2.1 release but we want to avoid
deploying a custom, self compiled version.
Is there something I can do to help with the release? I guess there
are no blocking issues left?
Best regards,
Harris
6 matches
Mail list logo
