Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options

I'll postpone for a while. I thought that value of "2" is the same as "1", I'll try to find better doc. seems that I didn''t specify "march" and that might be the cause. сб, 20 апр. 2024 г. в 15:21, Willy Tarreau : > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 03:11:19PM +0200, ??? wrote: > > ??, 20 ???.

Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options

On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 03:11:19PM +0200, ??? wrote: > ??, 20 ???. 2024 ?. ? 15:07, Willy Tarreau : > > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 02:49:38PM +0200, ??? wrote: > > > ??, 11 ???. 2024 ?. ? 21:05, Willy Tarreau : > > > > > > > Hi Ilya, > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at

Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options

сб, 20 апр. 2024 г. в 15:07, Willy Tarreau : > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 02:49:38PM +0200, ??? wrote: > > ??, 11 ???. 2024 ?. ? 21:05, Willy Tarreau : > > > > > Hi Ilya, > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 08:27:39PM +0200, ??? wrote: > > > > do you know maybe how this was

Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options

On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 02:49:38PM +0200, ??? wrote: > ??, 11 ???. 2024 ?. ? 21:05, Willy Tarreau : > > > Hi Ilya, > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 08:27:39PM +0200, ??? wrote: > > > do you know maybe how this was supposed to work ? > > > haproxy/Makefile at master ·

Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options

чт, 11 апр. 2024 г. в 21:05, Willy Tarreau : > Hi Ilya, > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 08:27:39PM +0200, ??? wrote: > > do you know maybe how this was supposed to work ? > > haproxy/Makefile at master · haproxy/haproxy (github.com) > >

Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options

сб, 13 апр. 2024 г. в 15:26, Willy Tarreau : > Hi Tristan, > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 07:38:18AM +, Tristan wrote: > > Hi Willy, > > > > > On 11 Apr 2024, at 18:18, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > > > Some distros simply found that stuffing their regular CFLAGS into > > > DEBUG_CFLAGS or

Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options

Hi Tristan, On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 07:38:18AM +, Tristan wrote: > Hi Willy, > > > On 11 Apr 2024, at 18:18, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > Some distros simply found that stuffing their regular CFLAGS into > > DEBUG_CFLAGS or CPU_CFLAGS does the trick most of the time. Others use > > other

Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options

Hi Willy, > On 11 Apr 2024, at 18:18, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Some distros simply found that stuffing their regular CFLAGS into > DEBUG_CFLAGS or CPU_CFLAGS does the trick most of the time. Others use > other combinations depending on the tricks they figured. Good to know I wasn’t alone

Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:43:14PM +0200, Dinko Korunic wrote: > Subject: Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options > > > On 11.04.2024., at 21:32, William Lallemand wrote: > > > > If I remember correctly github actions VMs only had 2 vCPU in the past, &

Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options

> On 11.04.2024., at 21:32, William Lallemand wrote: > > If I remember correctly github actions VMs only had 2 vCPU in the past, > I think they upgraded to 4 vCPU last year but I can't find anything in > their documentation. Hi William, GitHub runners Instance sizes for public repositories

Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:04:51PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Subject: Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options > Hi Ilya, > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 08:27:39PM +0200, ??? wrote: > > do you know maybe how this was supposed to work ? > > ha

Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options

Hi Ilya, On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 08:27:39PM +0200, ??? wrote: > do you know maybe how this was supposed to work ? > haproxy/Makefile at master · haproxy/haproxy (github.com) > That's this: ifneq ($(shell $(CC) $(CFLAGS)

Re: Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options

чт, 11 апр. 2024 г. в 19:18, Willy Tarreau : > Hi all, > > after all the time where we've all been complaining about the difficulty > to adjust CFLAGS during the build, I could tackle the problem for a first > step in the right direction. > > First, let's start with a bit of history to explain

Changes in HAProxy 3.0's Makefile and build options

Hi all, after all the time where we've all been complaining about the difficulty to adjust CFLAGS during the build, I could tackle the problem for a first step in the right direction. First, let's start with a bit of history to explain the situation and why it was bad. Originally, a trivial