Hi Lukas,
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 08:09:29PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> 2017-11-10 23:43 GMT+01:00 PiBa-NL :
> > Okay have been running with haproxy-ss-20171017 for a day now. Sofar it
> > sticks to <1% cpu usage.
>
> FYI a similar report is on discourse, on linux without splicin
Hello,
2017-11-10 23:43 GMT+01:00 PiBa-NL :
> Okay have been running with haproxy-ss-20171017 for a day now. Sofar it
> sticks to <1% cpu usage.
FYI a similar report is on discourse, on linux without splicing
involved. Upgrading from 1.7.9 to haproxy-ss-20171017 appears to have
solved the proble
Hi Pieter,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:43:41PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote:
> Okay have been running with haproxy-ss-20171017 for a day now. Sofar it
> sticks to <1% cpu usage.
>
> Will report if anything changes, cant tell for sure as don't have a clear
> reproduction of the issue, but my issue 'seems'
Hi Willy,
Op 9-11-2017 om 5:45 schreef Willy Tarreau:
Hi Pieter,
We had something similar on Linux in relation with TCP splicing and the
fd cache, for which a fix was emitted. But yesterday Christopher explained
me that the fix has an impact on the way applets are scheduled in 1.8, so
actually
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:25:11AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I just checked the contents and its OK. I think we have something wrong
> on the script which generates the snapshots. The git version and the date
> are normally updated on the fly by git when building the archive, thanks
> to attrib
Hi Pieter,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:18:30AM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote:
> Hi Willy, List,
>
> Is it correct that when i build a haproxy-ss-20171017 snapshot that the
> version still shows up as:
> "HAProxy version 1.7.9, released 2017/08/18"
> on both haproxy -vv and stats page.?
>
> Or did i do it
Hi Willy, List,
Is it correct that when i build a haproxy-ss-20171017 snapshot that the
version still shows up as:
"HAProxy version 1.7.9, released 2017/08/18"
on both haproxy -vv and stats page.?
Or did i do it wrong?
p.s. I changed the Makefile like this:
PORTNAME= haproxy-ss
PORTVERSION
Hi Willy,
Op 9-11-2017 om 5:45 schreef Willy Tarreau:
Hi Pieter,
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 02:28:46AM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote:
Actually haproxy has been running for a few weeks with 100% and i didnt
notice.. it does keep working it seems..
Anyhow thought i would try and capture the next event if i
Hi Pieter,
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 02:28:46AM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote:
> Actually haproxy has been running for a few weeks with 100% and i didnt
> notice.. it does keep working it seems..
>
> Anyhow thought i would try and capture the next event if it would happen
> again. It did after a few hours..
Hi List,
I've experienced a issue where its using 100% cpu usage with haproxy
1.7.9 on FreeBSD 11.1p3 / pfSense 2.4.2dev.
There is very little traffic actually hitting this haproxy instance. But
it happened for the second time in a few days now.
Actually haproxy has been running for a few wee
10 matches
Mail list logo
