Re: Q: about HTTP/2

Hi, I have a concret use case that need http/2 : one ssl frontend with multiple heterogeneous (h2,http/1.1) backends gRPC is http2 only and if you have to use it behind a single domain you need to be able to route http/2 traffic among http/1.1. In this case, I need to apply some http specific

Re: Q: about HTTP/2

On 07/04/2016 06:01 μμ, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Aleks, > > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:18:54PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: >> Hi Willy & other core devs/pms. >> >> I know that HTTP/2 is on the road-map but not ready yet. >> >> Would you be so kind and share some of your thoughts, stats and

Re: Q: about HTTP/2

Hi Aleks, On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:18:54PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Hi Willy & other core devs/pms. > > I know that HTTP/2 is on the road-map but not ready yet. > > Would you be so kind and share some of your thoughts, stats and plans for > HTTP/2. Well, the plan is to have *at

Re: Q: about HTTP/2

On 4/2/2016 6:23 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > What about the multiplexing of connections? If you use http 1.x to > communicate with the servers you effectively nullify that 2.0 feature. > At least in theory in order to actually get all the benefits from http/2 > you need support for the

Re: Q: about HTTP/2

On 01/04/2016 12:25 μμ, Baptiste wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: >> Hi Willy & other core devs/pms. >> >> I know that HTTP/2 is on the road-map but not ready yet. >> >> Would you be so kind and share some of your thoughts, stats and plans for

Re: Q: about HTTP/2

On 01.04.2016 16:35, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 4/1/2016 4:25 AM, Baptiste wrote: >> Do you guys, on the ML, really need HTTP/2? If so what's your deadline?? > > Need? Perhaps not. Want? Very much so. Deadline: ASAP, but don't be > in a hurry. I definitely prefer to have a battle-tested

Re: Q: about HTTP/2

On 4/1/2016 4:25 AM, Baptiste wrote: > Do you guys, on the ML, really need HTTP/2? If so what's your deadline?? Need? Perhaps not. Want? Very much so. Deadline: ASAP, but don't be in a hurry. I definitely prefer to have a battle-tested solution that takes a year than a lousy implementation

Re: Q: about HTTP/2

Hi Baptiste. Am 01-04-2016 12:25, schrieb Baptiste: On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: Hi Willy & other core devs/pms. I know that HTTP/2 is on the road-map but not ready yet. Would you be so kind and share some of your thoughts, stats and plans

Re: Q: about HTTP/2

Hi, > Do you guys, on the ML, really need HTTP/2? > If so what's your deadline?? Yea, we will definitively need it, our customers started asking about it two months ago. Management will probably start to worry about pissing off premium managed hosting customers if they keep asking and we can't

Re: Q: about HTTP/2

Hello Baptiste, We have been asked questions about HTTP/2 but it does not seem to be a block when we say its not fully supported in Layer7 Regards Andrew Smalley Loadbalancer.org http://www.loadbalancer.org On 1 April 2016 at 11:25, Baptiste wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016

Re: Q: about HTTP/2

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Hi Willy & other core devs/pms. > > I know that HTTP/2 is on the road-map but not ready yet. > > Would you be so kind and share some of your thoughts, stats and plans for > HTTP/2. > > Thank you very much. > > Best

Q: about HTTP/2

Hi Willy & other core devs/pms. I know that HTTP/2 is on the road-map but not ready yet. Would you be so kind and share some of your thoughts, stats and plans for HTTP/2. Thank you very much. Best regards Aleks