Re: Question on distribution not according to backend weight

Hi Babtiste, thanks a lot for your explanations! This totally makes sense, especially from a HA and throughput perspective. My use case is different and I'll try to explain how: * 30 servers are generating emails * 36 mail servers for sending out * relatively cheap h/w: 2 bonded 1Gbit interfaces,

Re: Question on distribution not according to backend weight

Hi Frank, My problem: The weight setting for a backend seems to be ignored when the > max concurrent session setting is reached. I was expecting the connection > to get queued for this backend but it seems to flip over to the host that > has connections available. > This is expected. The queue m

Re: Question on distribution not according to backend weight

> On 8 мая 2015 г., at 4:54, Frank Schubert wrote: > > Hi, > > first of all let me thank you for an amazing piece of software. I like > working with haproxy a lot! > > My problem: The weight setting for a backend seems to be ignored when the max > concurrent session setting is reached. I was