On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 18:26 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 05:52:50PM +0200, Bo??tjan Mer??un wrote:
Hi Willy
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 09:21 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
why are you saying that ? Except for rare cases of huge bugs, a server
is not limited in
: Monday, August 10, 2009 9:32 AM
To: Willy Tarreau
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Connection limiting Sorry servers
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 18:26 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 05:52:50PM +0200, Bo??tjan Mer??un wrote:
Hi Willy
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 09:21 +0200
Hi Willy
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 09:21 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
why are you saying that ? Except for rare cases of huge bugs, a server
is not limited in requests per second. At full speed, it will simply use
100% of the CPU, which is why you bought it after all. When a server dies,
it's
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 05:52:50PM +0200, Bo??tjan Mer??un wrote:
Hi Willy
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 09:21 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
why are you saying that ? Except for rare cases of huge bugs, a server
is not limited in requests per second. At full speed, it will simply use
100% of the
Hi Willy.
First, thank you for your answer.
I really don't know why you're limiting on the number of requests
per second. It is not the proper way to do this at all. In fact,
you should *only* need to play with the server's maxconn parameter,
as there should be no reason your servers would
Hi Bostjan,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:51:09AM +0200, Bo??tjan Mer??un wrote:
I really don't know why you're limiting on the number of requests
per second. It is not the proper way to do this at all. In fact,
you should *only* need to play with the server's maxconn parameter,
as there
6 matches
Mail list logo
