On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:55:46AM +0100, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
>
(...)
> Indeed, new patchs:
Both applied, many thanks Manu!
Willy
> Le 20 mars 2017 à 07:02, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
>
> Hi Manu,
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:35:42PM +0100, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
>> Hi Piotr,
>>
>>> Le 16 mars 2017 à 09:48, Piotr Kubaj a écrit :
>>>
>>> Thanks for the patch!
>>>
>>> Looks good to me,
Hi Manu,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:35:42PM +0100, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> > Le 16 mars 2017 à 09:48, Piotr Kubaj a écrit :
> >
> > Thanks for the patch!
> >
> > Looks good to me, works fine with Haproxy and LibreSSL 2.5.1.
> >
> great
>
> Willy, can you
Hi Piotr,Le 16 mars 2017 à 09:48, Piotr Kubaj a écrit :Thanks for the patch!Looks good to me, works fine with Haproxy and LibreSSL 2.5.1.greatWilly, can you merge this two patchs? It fix boringssl and libressl build issues.Piotr, this patchs should be minimise your patch for
> Le 14 mars 2017 à 16:28, Emmanuel Hocdet a écrit :
>
> Hi Piotr
>
>> Le 14 mars 2017 à 16:04, Piotr Kubaj a écrit :
>>
>> And it seems like the previously attached patches do compile, but the
>> warning is there again so now I'm finally including
Hi Piotr
> Le 14 mars 2017 à 16:04, Piotr Kubaj a écrit :
>
> And it seems like the previously attached patches do compile, but the warning
> is there again so now I'm finally including patches that make Haproxy both
> compile and not throw additional warnings.
>
first
And it seems like the previously attached patches do compile, but the warning
is there again so now I'm finally including patches that make Haproxy both
compile and not throw additional warnings.
--
__
/ What good is having someone who can \
| walk on
There seems to be some error when doing a clean compilation, so I'm sending
corrected patches.
--
/ Any stone in your boot always migrates \
| against the pressure gradient to |
| exactly the point of most pressure.|
|
I have reworked the patches, so that they don't cause any warning to appear.
--
_
/ In real love you want the other \
| person's good. In romantic love you |
| want the other person. |
| |
\ -- Margaret
Hi Piotr,
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 07:58:11PM +0100, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> Could you give your opinion on my patches and commit them if they're fine?
Sorry for the delay but I'm really burried under e-mails and work-related
stuff at the moment. And since your patches will require some manual
Could you give your opinion on my patches and commit them if they're fine?
On 17-02-15 15:46:23, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. Could you keep me in CC? I'm not subscribed to the
> list.
>
> > I don't understand much, your e-mail talks about openssl and you're changing
> > a line
Thanks for the feedback. Could you keep me in CC? I'm not subscribed to the
list.
> I don't understand much, your e-mail talks about openssl and you're changing
> a line afecting boringssl. You need to provide a bit of description about
> what your patch does and tries to solve, that we'll use
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 04:21:06PM +0100, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> Please try the corrected patches. Before Haproxy was kind of unstable. Now it
> seems to work fine. I also changed tests for defined LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER
> to testing LibreSSL version to keep the older versions working.
(...)
>
>
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, at 16:21, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> Please try the corrected patches. Before Haproxy was kind of unstable.
> Now it seems to work fine. I also changed tests for defined
> LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER to testing LibreSSL version to keep the older
> versions working.
>
> On 17-02-10
Please try the corrected patches. Before Haproxy was kind of unstable. Now it
seems to work fine. I also changed tests for defined LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER to
testing LibreSSL version to keep the older versions working.
On 17-02-10 13:48:20, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> I'm attaching two patches:
> a)
15 matches
Mail list logo