Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?

Hello. My vote to drop support for version 1.4 .marcoc

Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?

On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:09:50PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Willy, > > Am 02.01.2018 um 17:53 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > > Oh bad, you're right. I wanted to even remove the "main features" part as > > it's been totally outdated now. This page starts to age a lot. I really > > think we should

Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?

On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 07:03:07PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Willy, > > Am 02.01.2018 um 17:56 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > > Just checked there and not only I can only see "alpine" there, there's no > > single mention of debian on the page. Do you have another URL that I should > > add maybe ? >

Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?

Willy, Am 02.01.2018 um 17:53 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > Oh bad, you're right. I wanted to even remove the "main features" part as > it's been totally outdated now. This page starts to age a lot. I really > think we should replace it all with a wiki so that many more people could > participate to

Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?

Willy, Am 02.01.2018 um 17:56 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > Just checked there and not only I can only see "alpine" there, there's no > single mention of debian on the page. Do you have another URL that I should > add maybe ? > The ones without a "specifier" are the Debian based ones. This is a

Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?

On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:23:00PM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > The sustainability of haproxy is linked to the amount of work you (and > a /relatively/ small set of people) both have to do and want to do. > I would very much like it to continue happily, so I would vote to > reduce your mental

Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?

On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 05:53:00PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > And while you're at it: The "Alpine-based Docker images" link in the > > side bar technically should be named "Alpine / Debian-based Docker > > images", but this probably does not fit in. > > I can place two links, one with Alpine

Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?

Hi Tim! On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 05:28:37PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Hi > > Am 02.01.2018 um 16:12 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > > So please simply voice in. Just a few "please keep it alive" will be > > enough to convince me, otherwise I'll mark it unmaintained. > > > > Don't forget to update

RE: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?

ct: Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ? Yes Jonathan is right, do mark 'unmaintained' or remove it anyway 8 years... 1.5 also can be remove or unmaintained as well. Cheers ! And Happy New Year :-) On 2 January 2018 at 16:23, Jonathan Matthews <cont...@jpluscplusm.com<mailto:cont...@jpluscplusm

Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?

ent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 4:34:39 PM To: Jonathan Matthews; haproxy Subject: Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ? On 02/01/2018 04:23 μμ, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > On 2 January 2018 at 15:12, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: >> So please simply voice in. Just a few "please

Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?

On 02/01/2018 04:23 μμ, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > On 2 January 2018 at 15:12, Willy Tarreau wrote: >> So please simply voice in. Just a few "please keep it alive" will be >> enough to convince me, otherwise I'll mark it unmaintained. > > I don't use 1.4, but I do have a small

Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?

Yes Jonathan is right, do mark 'unmaintained' or remove it anyway 8 years... 1.5 also can be remove or unmaintained as well. Cheers ! And Happy New Year :-) On 2 January 2018 at 16:23, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > On 2 January 2018 at 15:12, Willy Tarreau

Re: Poll: haproxy 1.4 support ?

On 2 January 2018 at 15:12, Willy Tarreau wrote: > So please simply voice in. Just a few "please keep it alive" will be > enough to convince me, otherwise I'll mark it unmaintained. I don't use 1.4, but I do have a small reason to say please *do* mark it as unmaintained. The