Hi Cyril,

Thank you for enlightening me.. we'll correct that mistake :)

Cyril Bonté wrote on 02/24/2015 09:20 AM:
Hi Klavs,

Le 24/02/2015 08:56, Klavs Klavsen a écrit :
Hi guys,

A colleague just found an issue last night, where this acl:

acl is_kk-dk  hdr_end(host) -i kkdk3.testkkdk.kk.dk hdr(host) -i
readonly.kk.dk hdr(host) -i readonly.testkkdk.kk.dk hdr(host) -i
www.testkkdk.kk.dk hdr(host) -i kktest.kk.dk hdr(host) -i www.kk.dk
hdr(host) -i kk.dk

This is not how acls are supposed to be declared.
Here, you are specefying only one acl based on hdr_end(host), followed
by any value following. Here, it means that "hdr(host)" is considered as
a value.

matches hosts like hest.kk.dk :(

Indeed, because the last value "kk.dk" matches the real acl hdr_end(host)

He changed the first: hdr_end(host) to just hdr(host) - and it worked as
it should..

it seems if you use hdr_end on first match- that is used on the rest
even though it shouldn't ?

No, it really should.

I guess you wanted to have :
   acl is_kk-dk  hdr_end(host) -i kkdk3.testkkdk.kk.dk
   acl is_kk-dk  hdr(host) -i readonly.kk.dk readonly.testkkdk.kk.dk
www.testkkdk.kk.dk kktest.kk.dk www.kk.dk kk.dk



We're running haproxy 1.5.11 on those boxes.




--
Regards,
Klavs Klavsen, GSEC - k...@vsen.dk - http://www.vsen.dk - Tlf. 61281200

"Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly."
  --Henry Spencer


Reply via email to