Dne 25.9.2015 v 11:21 Emeric Brun napsal(a):
On 09/25/2015 11:00 AM, Miloš Kozák wrote:
OK, and is it possible to dump the content of such a buffer for inspection?
There is no easy way to do that.
Dne 25.9.2015 v 10:16 Baptiste napsal(a):
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Miloš Kozák wrote:
On 09/25/2015 11:00 AM, Miloš Kozák wrote:
> OK, and is it possible to dump the content of such a buffer for inspection?
There is no easy way to do that.
> Dne 25.9.2015 v 10:16 Baptiste napsal(a):
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Miloš Kozák wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thank you for that fix. My
OK, and is it possible to dump the content of such a buffer for inspection?
Dne 25.9.2015 v 10:16 Baptiste napsal(a):
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Miloš Kozák wrote:
Hi,
thank you for that fix. My solution, which uses -m found, works perfectly
now!
BTW how one can check which packets are
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Miloš Kozák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thank you for that fix. My solution, which uses -m found, works perfectly
> now!
>
> BTW how one can check which packets are considered in that inspect-delay
> time period?
>
> Milos
>
Hi,
HAProxy is not aware of packets. Your kernel
Hi,
thank you for that fix. My solution, which uses -m found, works
perfectly now!
BTW how one can check which packets are considered in that inspect-delay
time period?
Milos
Dne 24.9.2015 v 16:48 Emeric Brun napsal(a):
Hi,
On 09/24/2015 03:42 PM, Miloš Kozák wrote:
I am getting this er
Hi,
On 09/24/2015 03:42 PM, Miloš Kozák wrote:
> I am getting this error:
>
> matching method 'found' cannot be used with fetch keyword 'req.payload'
Willy've just push a fix about that!
> In order to detect correct frame I do something like this do you think it is
> enough?
>
>acl px r
I am getting this error:
matching method 'found' cannot be used with fetch keyword 'req.payload'
In order to detect correct frame I do something like this do you think
it is enough?
acl px req.payload(0,4) -m bin FF00FF00
acl rib req.payload(5,4) -m bin
tcp-request content
Hi Milos,
On 09/24/2015 09:16 AM, Miloš Kozák wrote:
> I did try even that..
>
> Interesting thing happens when I set tcp-inspect delay to 10s, my stickiness
> rule appears after 30s. The problem is it takes very much of time, and the
> stickiness then actually does not work, i.e., I can see th
I did try even that..
Interesting thing happens when I set tcp-inspect delay to 10s, my
stickiness rule appears after 30s. The problem is it takes very much of
time, and the stickiness then actually does not work, i.e., I can see
that every further response goes from different server. Also, th
original message-
De: "Milo? Koz�k" milos.ko...@lejmr.com
A: haproxy@formilux.org
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 08:21:48 +0200
-
> Any thoughts?
>
> Dne 22.9.2015 v 09:35 Milo? Koz�k napsal(a):
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am tr
Any thoughts?
Dne 22.9.2015 v 09:35 Miloš Kozák napsal(a):
Hi,
I am trying to set up a load balancer for a special binary protocol
which uses TCP for transport. Each TCP payload starts with sequence of
bytes which can be used for load balancing and stickiness. Each packet
starts with
Hi,
I am trying to set up a load balancer for a special binary protocol
which uses TCP for transport. Each TCP payload starts with sequence of
bytes which can be used for load balancing and stickiness. Each packet
starts with
4B ... protocol identifier FF00FF00
1B ... protocol version
Hi,
I am trying to set up a load balancer for a special binary protocol
which uses TCP for transport. Each TCP payload starts with sequence of
bytes which can be used for load balancing and stickiness. Each packet
starts with
4B ... protocol identifier FF00FF00
1B ... protocol version
13 matches
Mail list logo
