On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 11:00:24PM +, Tristan wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> On 09/02/2024 20:31, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> > I run QUIC Interop from time to time, WolfSSL shows the best
> > compatibility compared to LibreSSL and aws-lc.
> > it really looks like a winner today
>
> And in comparison to
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 02:46:46PM +, Tristan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Hello,
> With the ever-increasing threat of one day needing to give up on OpenSSL
> 1.1.1 (whenever the next bad CVE is found on QuicTLS 1.1.1w, essentially) I
> was looking at alternatives a bit closer.
>
> Based on the
сб, 10 февр. 2024 г. в 00:00, Tristan :
> Hi Ilya,
>
> On 09/02/2024 20:31, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> > I run QUIC Interop from time to time, WolfSSL shows the best
> > compatibility compared to LibreSSL and aws-lc.
> > it really looks like a winner today
>
> And in comparison to current QuicTLS?
>
Hi Ilya,
On 09/02/2024 20:31, Илья Шипицин wrote:
I run QUIC Interop from time to time, WolfSSL shows the best
compatibility compared to LibreSSL and aws-lc.
it really looks like a winner today
And in comparison to current QuicTLS?
I'm afraid it practice it works in a different way.
First,
чт, 8 февр. 2024 г. в 15:49, Tristan :
> Hi all,
>
> With the ever-increasing threat of one day needing to give up on OpenSSL
> 1.1.1 (whenever the next bad CVE is found on QuicTLS 1.1.1w,
> essentially) I was looking at alternatives a bit closer.
>
> Based on the wiki,
>
Hi all,
With the ever-increasing threat of one day needing to give up on OpenSSL
1.1.1 (whenever the next bad CVE is found on QuicTLS 1.1.1w,
essentially) I was looking at alternatives a bit closer.
Based on the wiki,
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/20286#issuecomment-1527869072,
6 matches
Mail list logo
