Re: dns fails to process response / hold valid? (since commit 2.2-dev0-13a9232)

Hi Baptiste, Op 19-2-2020 om 13:06 schreef Baptiste: Hi, I found a couple of bugs in that part of the code. Can you please try the attached patch? (0001 is useless but I share it too in case of) Works for me, thanks! It will allow parsing of additional records for SRV queries only and when

Re: dns fails to process response / hold valid? (since commit 2.2-dev0-13a9232)

Hi, I found a couple of bugs in that part of the code. Can you please try the attached patch? (0001 is useless but I share it too in case of) It will allow parsing of additional records for SRV queries only and when done, will silently ignore any record which are not A or . @maint team,

Re: dns fails to process response / hold valid? (since commit 2.2-dev0-13a9232)

Hi guys, Thx Tim for investigating. I'll check the PCAP and see why such behavior happens. Baptiste On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:09 AM Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Pieter, > > Am 09.02.20 um 15:35 schrieb PiBa-NL: > > Before commit '2.2-dev0-13a9232, released 2020/01/22 (use additional > > records

Re: dns fails to process response / hold valid? (since commit 2.2-dev0-13a9232)

Pieter, Am 09.02.20 um 15:35 schrieb PiBa-NL: > Before commit '2.2-dev0-13a9232, released 2020/01/22 (use additional > records from SRV responses)' i get seemingly proper working resolving of > server a name. > After this commit all responses are counted as 'invalid' in the socket > stats. I can

Re: dns fails to process response / hold valid? (since commit 2.2-dev0-13a9232)

Pieter, Am 17.02.20 um 22:14 schrieb PiBa-NL: > (maybe the pcap attachment didn't fly well through spam filters. (or the > email formatting..)?) I received your first email perfectly fine. > If someone was already planning to, please don't feel 'pushed' by this > mail. i'm just trying to make

Re: dns fails to process response / hold valid? (since commit 2.2-dev0-13a9232)

Hi List, Hereby a little bump. Can someone take a look? (maybe the pcap attachment didn't fly well through spam filters. (or the email formatting..)?) (or because i (wrongly?) chose to include Baptiste specifically in my addressing (he committed the original patch that caused the change in

dns fails to process response / hold valid? (since commit 2.2-dev0-13a9232)

Hi List, Baptiste, After updating haproxy i found that the DNS resolver is no longer working for me. Also i wonder about the exact effect that 'hold valid' should have. I pointed haproxy to a 'Unbound 1.9.4' dns server that does the recursive resolving of the dns request made by haproxy.