On 12.12.2011 14:32, Vincent Bernat wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:23:11 +0100, Sander Klein wrote:
I started doing this because there is no nonlocal_bind option
for
IPv6 (or I didn't search well enough (-: )
From the source code, it seems that IPv4 non local bind sysctl
also
applies to
Hi!
When haproxy is bound to an IP address managed by VRRP, this IP address
may be absent when haproxy starts. What is the best way to handle this?
1. Start haproxy only when the host is master.
2. Use transparent mode.
3. Patch haproxy to use IP_FREEBIND option.
Le lundi 12 décembre 2011 10:18:33, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
Hi!
When haproxy is bound to an IP address managed by VRRP, this IP address
may be absent when haproxy starts. What is the best way to handle this?
1. Start haproxy only when the host is master.
2. Use transparent mode.
On 12 December 2011 11:18, Vincent Bernat ber...@luffy.cx wrote:
Hi!
When haproxy is bound to an IP address managed by VRRP, this IP address may
be absent when haproxy starts. What is the best way to handle this?
1. Start haproxy only when the host is master.
2. Use transparent mode.
3.
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:28:21 +0200, Graeme Donaldson wrote:
When haproxy is bound to an IP address managed by VRRP, this IP
address may
be absent when haproxy starts. What is the best way to handle this?
1. Start haproxy only when the host is master.
2. Use transparent mode.
3. Patch
On 12.12.2011 10:28, Guillaume Castagnino wrote:
Le lundi 12 décembre 2011 10:18:33, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
Hi!
When haproxy is bound to an IP address managed by VRRP, this IP
address
may be absent when haproxy starts. What is the best way to handle
this?
1. Start haproxy only when the
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:04:22 +0100, Sander Klein wrote:
I started doing this because there is no nonlocal_bind option for
IPv6 (or I didn't search well enough (-: )
From the source code, it seems that IPv4 non local bind sysctl also
applies to IPv6. Since 2.6.30.
Hmmm, then I'm going to
On 12.12.2011 13:10, Vincent Bernat wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:04:22 +0100, Sander Klein wrote:
I started doing this because there is no nonlocal_bind option for
IPv6 (or I didn't search well enough (-: )
From the source code, it seems that IPv4 non local bind sysctl also
applies to IPv6.
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:23:11 +0100, Sander Klein wrote:
I started doing this because there is no nonlocal_bind option for
IPv6 (or I didn't search well enough (-: )
From the source code, it seems that IPv4 non local bind sysctl
also
applies to IPv6. Since 2.6.30.
Hmmm, then I'm going to
9 matches
Mail list logo