Could someone be kind enough to take a stab at this? It is really important for
us to know this. And the documentation just is not clear at all.
thanksJeff
From: jeffsar...@hotmail.com
To: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: the order of evaluation of acl's
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:12:43 -0400
Could someone be kind enough to take a stab at this? It is really
important for us to know this. And the documentation just is not clear
at all.
Whats wrong with the existing replies?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.haproxy/18827/focus=18984
Lukas
my apologies. This was already answered. Somehow when i checked my posting in
Marc list it didn't show me the thread of conversation.
Sorry about that
From: luky...@hotmail.com
To: jeffsar...@hotmail.com; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: RE: the order of evaluation of acl's
Date: Thu, 6 Nov
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Conrad Hoffmann con...@soundcloud.com wrote:
Hi,
On 10/24/2014 02:12 PM, jeff saremi wrote:
What is the order of evaluation of 'and's and 'or's in a use_backend clause?
This is what the docs say:
[!]acl1 [!]acl2 ... [!]acln { or [!]acl1 [!]acl2 ... [!]acln
Hi,
On 10/24/2014 02:12 PM, jeff saremi wrote:
What is the order of evaluation of 'and's and 'or's in a use_backend clause?
This is what the docs say:
[!]acl1 [!]acl2 ... [!]acln { or [!]acl1 [!]acl2 ... [!]acln } ...
and apparently i cannot use paranthesis to group them. However i need
What is the order of evaluation of 'and's and 'or's in a use_backend clause?
This is what the docs say:
[!]acl1 [!]acl2 ... [!]acln { or [!]acl1 [!]acl2 ... [!]acln } ...
and apparently i cannot use paranthesis to group them. However i need to write
something like the following:
use_backend
6 matches
Mail list logo
