Hi,
I know this thread thanks you :-)
I just want to know if there is a way to do this whiteout iptables.
Thanks
Falco
2010/3/2 Evgeniy Sudyr eject.in...@gmail.com
Falco,
try this thread http://www.formilux.org/archives/haproxy/0805/0976.html
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Falco Schmutz
Hi,
I know this thread thanks you :-)
I just want to know if there is a way to do this whiteout iptables.
2010/3/2 Evgeniy Sudyr eject.in...@gmail.com
Falco,
try this thread http://www.formilux.org/archives/haproxy/0805/0976.html
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Falco Schmutz
Good morning everyone,
WT I hope you don't mind that I CC the list and Krzysztof who needed
WT the line which caused the problem on your side.
No problem, I just hit reply, rather than reply-all out of habit.
However, instead of using _XOPEN_SOURCE we may use something less
invasive (I hope),
Hi All, anyone have any ideas if this is something in version bug (do not
want to upgrade if not) or is something I can control with configuration.
So what I see running haproxy is when there are bursts (an additional lets
say 1,000 connections) i get NOSRV from all of my backend servers.
I set
Hi Joe,
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:30:50PM -0500, Joe Stein wrote:
Hi All, anyone have any ideas if this is something in version bug (do not
want to upgrade if not) or is something I can control with configuration.
So what I see running haproxy is when there are bursts (an additional lets
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:21:34AM +0100, Falco Schmutz wrote:
Hi,
I know this thread thanks you :-)
I just want to know if there is a way to do this whiteout iptables.
Not right now, we would need to develop an FTP protocol parser
and the ability to expect incoming connections (basically just
the problem got serious so I stood up another LB set of instances and
installed v1.3.23 all traffic is getting routed over to it.
what I used to see in the logs where just NOSRV 503 in the haproxy log once
it hit max con. Now that we upgraded (or rather migrated) let me see if the
issue
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 02:34:46PM -0500, Joe Stein wrote:
the problem got serious so I stood up another LB set of instances and
installed v1.3.23 all traffic is getting routed over to it.
what I used to see in the logs where just NOSRV 503 in the haproxy log once
it hit max con.
OK but
how do you change the timeout setting?
This is what we have now in default (using same config as before)
contimeout 1m
clitimeout 240s
srvtimeout 240s
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 02:34:46PM
another symptom we saw often was we could not get to the stats page or even
ssh into the box when this was happening
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Joe Stein joe.st...@medialets.com wrote:
how do you change the timeout setting?
This is what we have now in default (using same config as
Hello Willy.
On 2 March 2010 21:45, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
If your quick ack already works for one single check, then simply
allocate a buffer for each server in cfgparse.c, and have the
checks functions use that server-specific buffer instead of
trash.
Thanks for the pointer. I've
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 02:48:30PM -0500, Joe Stein wrote:
how do you change the timeout setting?
This is what we have now in default (using same config as before)
contimeout 1m
clitimeout 240s
srvtimeout 240s
you can use timeout queue xxx. I also
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 08:12:09PM +, Nick Chalk wrote:
Hello Willy.
On 2 March 2010 21:45, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
If your quick ack already works for one single check, then simply
allocate a buffer for each server in cfgparse.c, and have the
checks functions use that
Hi Holger,
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:46:33PM +0100, Holger Just wrote:
Hi there,
As I recently started to use Solaris in favor of Linux I stumbled over
the impossibility to fully integrate Haproxy into the SMF framework.
The problem is the way graceful reloads are implemented in Haproxy
Hi All,
I have been writing a perl script for creating RRD files, logging and
graphing the current sessions, queue length and status of backend
servers in my environments.
It uses either the CSV output from the status page for remote monitoring
or the output from the local haproxy unix
Hi all,
We're moving to a system where each of our customers will have a
separate xen server with just that customer's data and an instance of
the webapplication in it (multiple users/customer). Now we have the
issue of routing user sessions to the appropriate backend server after
they have
16 matches
Mail list logo
