On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:03:15PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Finn,
Yes, thanks for the update, I noticed this too and fixed it during
tests. I'm OK with this method. I have just replaced the macros with
inline functions (which I verified produced the same code) because
the result is
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 09:59:46AM +0200, Finn Arne Gangstad wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:03:15PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Finn,
Yes, thanks for the update, I noticed this too and fixed it during
tests. I'm OK with this method. I have just replaced the macros with
inline
Hi,
I have been using haproxy for my lab servers for a while and I like it.
But i have seen in my web server logs (iis) that I get empty User-Agent strings
on most attempts to access files that not exists.
Some examples:
#Fields: date time s-sitename s-computername s-ip cs-method cs-uri-stem
Hi Matthias,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 10:19:28PM +0200, mattias.ed...@menco.se wrote:
Hi,
I have been using haproxy for my lab servers for a while and I like it.
But i have seen in my web server logs (iis) that I get empty User-Agent
strings on most attempts to access files that not exists.
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:53:18PM +0200, Damien Hardy wrote:
By the way, haproxy could be configured with default max size at 1024 and if
we want to increase it by config it may be available (as long as we are not
using a real syslog server).
My concern is about network device with UDP
Hi Christophe,
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:54:29AM -0700, Christophe Rahier wrote:
Yes ...
Is it possible to improve my config?
Well, your config already allows a server to take as much as 50 seconds
to respond, and still some requests don't respond within this delay.
This is really huge and
Hi Ernesto,
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:32:05AM -0400, Ernesto Rodriguez Reina wrote:
Hi Everyone!
We move from nginx to haproxy for load balancing and all have been
great! All we do with nginx (as balancer) we have been able to do it
using haproxy, except for reprocessing a request on http
Hi all,
Five months have elapsed since 1.5-dev6. A massive amount of changes was
merged since then. Most of them were cleanups and optimizations. A number
of changes were dedicated to making listeners more autonomous. The immediate
effect is a more robust handling of resource saturation, and the
Hi Hank,
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:26:39AM -0700, Hank A. Paulson wrote:
I was wondering if acls that I create in the frontend should be available
in backends, too? I was getting errors when I tried but the error
disappeared when I either moved the reqadd/rspadd to the frontend or if I
I forgot to add something : I have updated the README file to request
a change in the format of the subject in patches. To put it short,
I'd like that we avoid the square brackets for the parts we want to
keep in the commit message. The reason is that Git either removes all
words enclosed within
10 matches
Mail list logo