Hey,
According to me, it's easier to change the NIC, since your
intermittent issues may happen under load only.
With HAProxy, I can't see anything you can currently do to avoid this behavior.
I mean that NIC intermittent issues may happen under load, so haproxy
would consider server down.
load
Hi,
There is no way to do this.
Even using stick tables, since only entries from a table are
synchronized and not counters associated to each of them.
sorry.
cheers
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Mariusz Gronczewski xani...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
we have 2 haproxy servers in active-active
Hello,
I try to install apache cluster with haproxy, the question is: is it
necessary that apache nodes are in the same subnet with the loadbalancer
nodes?
--
Sincerly yours,
Fraj KALLEL.
Hi,
there is no reason for such configuration.
HAProxy can be installed either in the same subnet or in a different
subnet with no issues at all: it works as a reverse proxy in such
case.
cheers
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Fraj KALLEL frajkal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I try to install
2012/2/2 Fraj KALLEL frajkal...@gmail.com
Hello,
I try to install apache cluster with haproxy, the question is: is it
necessary that apache nodes are in the same subnet with the loadbalancer
nodes?
No, it isn't necessary. It is enough when haproxy can connect to apache
servers.
--
Thanks for the response.
The stats were lagging actually, we determined that the bottleneck was
before HAproxy (it ended up being the IPS in front of the network)
However, our linux guy suggested the following sysctl changes to enhance
throughput which i will share here:
net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse =
Hi Im A Student In School And Your Proxy Sites Are Really Useful Can You Please
Send Me Updates On The Sites Because They Seem To Block All The Ones We Knew.
Thank You
Our web servers (behind haproxy) issue 500 error codes to pass
information back to our client application on how to handle future
requests. We use standard codes, like 500, 501, 502 but also use some
non standard ones, 512 and 513.
It seems that haproxy converts these non-standard error codes
That's the problem . We did have a hardware issue on the NIC and the load
balancer kept putting the server live / dead all the time. Unfortunately
the NIC wasn't monitored so we had no idea the NIC was flapping. (This has
is now monitored)
My issue that the NIC flapping caused the load balancer
Hi,
Your request is legitimate, but I don't see how to do this with HAProxy itself.
You need to write a third party script to do this.
What I would do is to configure HAProxy logs, configure my syslog to
isolate legitimate traffic from server status changes.
That way, with a third party script
Hello. I'm having an issue with connections to haproxy hanging upon the
connect stage. My setup is 2 nginx/php-fpm backends with haproxy load
balancing them (3 servers total). When connecting directly to the app
servers everything is great, but through haproxy my browser hangs at
connecting
Hi,
You should setup net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range as well to increase
allowed opened ports to servers.
Your maxconns seems too high, but I doubt this is the source of your issue.
cheers
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Ivan Ator ivanat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello. I'm having an issue with
As per my existing sysctl.conf:
net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 200064000
I don't think I can do much more :(
On 2/2/2012 1:32 PM, Baptiste wrote:
Hi,
You should setup net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range as well to increase
allowed opened ports to servers.
Your maxconns seems too high, but I
I tend to have really large rise, and small fall like 2 and 9 (or 99 or
higher would be good if you want to ensure it stays down long enough to
trigger). That way they stay dead for awhile, but can go down quickly.
Anyways, so that it shows in my monitoring system I have this in my zabbix
cfg
14 matches
Mail list logo
