Hi,
If you have enabled minconn, it's an expected behavior :)
otherwise, sharing your conf, screenshot and haproxy version would help a lot.
Baptiste
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If you have enabled minconn, it's an expected behavior :)
otherwise, sharing your conf, screenshot and haproxy version would help a
lot.
Sorry for that, yep, we're using minconn (don't ask me why, I did not set
it up) and
Hi Joe,
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 04:45:21PM -0700, Joe Williams wrote:
Best I can tell this is specifically due to having http-server-close enabled
in my defaults section. Commenting that out seems to fix this issue. I assume
the connection gets killed just after the upgrade is completed and
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 10:23:08AM +0800, Mark Green wrote:
Hi,
I read the source code,
but don't quit understand the to_forward of buffer.
what does it exactly mean? what data it refers to?
to_forward is the amount of bytes that can still be transferred from
the socket attached
Hi,
I'm trying to determine if haproxy can be configured to solve a rate
limiting based problem I have. I believe that it can, but that I am not
seeing how to put the configuration together to get it done. Here's what
I'm trying to do:
I have a set of servers (backends) that can each handle a
5 matches
Mail list logo