Haproxy - Large number of Req Resp Errors, 504 bad gateway
Hi Guys, I have 2 different HAProxy setups 1xLB, 2xWebServers 1xDB. The first of the setups has been running for 2+years, the second has been running for 2-3 weeks. Both have recently had a number of users are reporting 504 bad gateway errors from multiple isp's. All I have noticed is that In the HAProxy stats pages for both, a number of Req Resp Errors are showing up. They seem to slowly build up and up over the hours. I am not too sure where to start for tracking down these Req Resp errors the 504 issues for that matter and if the two are related. Any tips? Syd
Re: Prevent HAProxy from toggeling back from fallback to primary
In data martedì 23 luglio 2013 17:23:07, hushmeh...@hushmail.com ha scritto: On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:48:22 +0200 Claudio M. hapr...@cmaffio.it wrote: server web1.bk 192.168.0.43:80 cookie web1.bk check port 80 maxconn 100 backup I need that when both primary servers go down and web1.bk go online, when web1b.mi and/or web1d.mi go up haproxy not switch to these I am not completly sure what you want. If web1b/d.mi is UP again after a failure, you still see sessions send to web1.bk and you dont want that? If so, then use the non-stick option and dont add a cookie, like: server web1.bk 192.168.0.43:80 check port 80 maxconn 100 backup non- stick web1b adnd web1d are in a cluster and are on sync by drbd, web1.bk is out the cluster and is on sync by rsync every 60 minutes. If the DRBD cluster fails, i need to resync data from web1.bk to the cluster before haproxy starts to send connections to the cluster Best regards Claudio
Major differences between 1.4 and 1.5
Hi. Can anyone elaborate on this. I promise I'm not being too lazy, but I can't find a side-by-side feature comparison against these two releases. Thanks in advance, Errol Neal
Re: Major differences between 1.4 and 1.5
On 25 July 2013 17:13, Errol Neal en...@businessgrade.com wrote: Hi. Can anyone elaborate on this. I promise I'm not being too lazy, but I can't find a side-by-side feature comparison against these two releases. 1.4 is stable. 1.5 is still in dev, but brings at least SSL and (peer-shared?) stick tables in as features. That stable/dev difference may decide it for you - it would for me in most circumstances. I'm sure more knowledgable people will chime in with more detailed comparisons. J -- Jonathan Matthews Oxford, London, UK http://www.jpluscplusm.com/contact.html
