On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:34:31AM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Hi all,
Le 18/05/2014 00:10, Thomas Heil a écrit :
Ive tried with this patch
-b
Index: haproxy-1.5-dev25/src/cfgparse.c
===
---
Willy,
Thanks for the response. I wrote the reply as I read through, so it's
interesting to see that we've pursued similar lines of thought about how
to solve this problem.
I think our workload is very different from 'normal'. We have several
quite long lived connections, with a modest
Dear Client,
For the security of your account, kindly Re-Login Below
https://www.my.commbank.com.au/
Â
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Hi Andy,
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 03:16:34PM +0100, Andrew Phillips wrote:
Willy,
Thanks for the response. I wrote the reply as I read through, so it's
interesting to see that we've pursued similar lines of thought about how
to solve this problem.
I think our workload is very different
Hi Conrad,
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 08:31:46PM +0200, Conrad Hoffmann wrote:
Hi Willy,
On 05/17/2014 04:39 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On 05/15/2014 11:26 AM, Conrad Hoffmann wrote:
If haproxy has been running for a certain amount of time (this part
makes reproduction cumbersome), we quite
Hi John,
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 05:49:59PM +, JDzialo John wrote:
Hi Guys,
We have been using haproxy and have loved it and appreciate all the hard work
you have put into this great product.
I am new to the project and still trying to grasp it's complexities so
forgive me in advance
Hi Rémi,
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 06:34:01PM +0200, Remi Gacogne wrote:
Hi,
On 05/05/2014 12:06 PM, Sander Klein wrote:
I've added a 2048bit dhparam to my most used certificates and I don't
see a big jump in resource usage.
This was not a big scientific test, I just added the DH
7 matches
Mail list logo
