Hi Tom,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 05:05:20PM -0700, Tom Hood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've built haproxy 1.8.9 with gcc 4.2.0 on Solaris 10, but I'm not sure how
> to verify my build.
Well, first and foremost, you must absolutely use an up-to-date version
in the branch you choose. Latest version in the 1.
Hi,
I've built haproxy 1.8.9 with gcc 4.2.0 on Solaris 10, but I'm not sure how
to verify my build. I had to define THREAD_LOCAL to be empty in
include/common/config.h, but otherwise it seemed to build cleanly.
Build command: gmake TARGET=solaris CPU=ultrasparc USE_OPENSSL=1
SSL_INC= SSL_LIB=
Op 29-8-2018 om 14:29 schreef Olivier Houchard:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 02:11:45PM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
This patch is in relation with one bug reproduced by the reg testing file
sent by Pieter in this thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg31079.html
Must be che
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 02:11:45PM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
> This patch is in relation with one bug reproduced by the reg testing file
> sent by Pieter in this thread:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg31079.html
>
> Must be checked by Thierry.
> Must be backported to
This patch is in relation with one bug reproduced by the reg testing
file sent by Pieter in this thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg31079.html
Must be checked by Thierry.
Must be backported to 1.8.
Note that Pieter reg testing files reg-tests/lua/b2.* come with th
On 08/28/2018 11:19 AM, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
On 08/27/2018 10:46 PM, PiBa-NL wrote:
Hi Frederic, Oliver,
Hi Pieter,
Thanks for your investigations :).
I've made a little reg-test (files attached). Its probably not
'correct' to commit as-is, but should be enough to get a
reproduction..
6 matches
Mail list logo