Re: High CPU Usage followed by segfault error

FYI, the initial version which we were using before upgrading to 1.8.14 was 1.8.13. By mistake updated it as 1.8.3 in my first email. Thanks On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:10 PM Soji Antony wrote: > Hi Olivier, > > Many thanks for your reply. > Please find the gdb output given below. > > # gdb

Patch : remove useless test

Hi, Very minor patch : remove a useless test that always evaluate to false. 0001-MINOR-same-length-test-is-made-just-before.patch Description: Binary data Mildis

Re: Few problems seen in haproxy? (threads, connections).

Hi again, finally I got rid of the FD lock for single-threaded accesses (most of them), and based on Olivier's suggestion, I implemented a per-thread wait queue, and cache-aligned some list heads to avoid undesired cache line sharing. For me all of this combined resulted in a performance increase

Re: High CPU Usage followed by segfault error

Hi Olivier, Many thanks for your reply. Please find the gdb output given below. # gdb /usr/sbin/haproxy core.dump3.13871 GNU gdb (Ubuntu 7.7.1-0ubuntu5~14.04.3) 7.7.1 Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later

Re: [PATCH] DOC: Fix typo

Applied, thank you Bertrand. Willy

Re: Seamless reload and servers connections status

Hello Sébastien, On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 16:40, Sébastien Kurtzemann wrote: >> No. Only *restart* closes existing front and backend connections. >> Reload (both seamless and regular) closes them gracefully, so no >> request is lost. > > > Okay. I think I confound connections and servers

Re: Seamless reload and servers connections status

Hi, On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:53 AM Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hello, > > > On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 at 10:34, Sébastien Kurtzemann wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I’ve got a question about haproxy "seamless reload" : when this > > operation is perform does all backend servers connections be reset ? > > No.

Re: gRPC protocol

On 5/24/18 5:54 PM, Daniel Corbett wrote: > Hello Aleks, > > > On 05/24/2018 10:54 AM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: >> >> I remembert that Willy mentioned this in any of his mail. >> Do you have any rough timeline, this year, next year something like this >> ;-) >> > > We're aiming to have the

Re: High CPU Usage followed by segfault error

Hi, On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 01:34:53PM +0530, Soji Antony wrote: > Really appreciate if some one can help with this issue. This is happening > quite frequently on our servers. I have taken a coredump when this happened > last time using 'gcore' command. However unable to share it as it might >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9-dev3

Hi Tim, On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 04:44:38PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > in a debian:sid Docker Container: > > > root@df1d20d1da29:/pwd# dpkg -l 'gcc*' |grep '^ii' > > ii gcc 4:8.2.0-1amd64GNU C compiler > > ii gcc-88.2.0-7 amd64GNU C

Re: Seamless reload and servers connections status

Hello, On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 at 10:34, Sébastien Kurtzemann wrote: > > Hi, > > I’ve got a question about haproxy "seamless reload" : when this > operation is perform does all backend servers connections be reset ? No. Only *restart* closes existing front and backend connections. Reload (both