[PATCH] REGTEST/MINOR: remove double body specification for server txresp

Hi List, I'm getting a regtest failure for the h1.vtc test, seemingly because varnishtest doesn't like the definition. Error (full log attached): s1    0.0 http[23] |be-hdr-crc: 3634102538 s1    0.0 bodylen = 0 **   s1    0.0 === txresp \ s1    0.0 Assert error in

Re: [PATCH] REGTEST/MINOR: remove double body specification for server txresp

Hi Pieter, On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 07:51:59PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote: > Hi List, > > I'm getting a regtest failure for the h1.vtc test, seemingly because > varnishtest doesn't like the definition. > > Error (full log attached): > s1    0.0 http[23] |be-hdr-crc: 3634102538 > s1   

[PATCH] REGTEST/MINOR: skip seamless-reload test with abns socket on freebsd

Hi List, Willy, Added below to the reg-tests/seamless-reload/b0.vtc, I'm sure there are other targets to be excluded, but I'm not sure which. Or should i have listed 'all' targets except the 5 linux22 - linux2628 specific versions to be excluded? Only thing I know for sure it doesn't work

Re: regtest failure for /log/b00000.vtc, tcp health-check makes and closes a connection to s1 server without valid http-request

On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 12:00:24AM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote: > The patch i prefer would be 'c', to remove the 'check' from the server line. > As it simply removes all possibly check related 'issues'. OK now done, thank you! willy

regtest failure for /log/b00000.vtc, tcp health-check makes and closes a connection to s1 server without valid http-request

Hi List, Willy, The regtest  /reg-tests/log/b0.vtc, is failing for me as shown below, and attached: ***  s1    0.0 accepted fd 5 127.0.0.1 29538 **   s1    0.0 === rxreq s1    0.0 HTTP rx failed (fd:5 read: Connection reset by peer) ***  c1    0.0 closing fd 8 **   c1    0.0 Ending * 

Re: [PATCH] REGTEST/MINOR: skip seamless-reload test with abns socket on freebsd

Hi Pieter, On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 09:01:32PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote: > Hi List, Willy, > > Added below to the reg-tests/seamless-reload/b0.vtc, I'm sure there are > other targets to be excluded, but I'm not sure which. Or should i have > listed 'all' targets except the 5 linux22 - linux2628

Re: regtest failure for /log/b00000.vtc, tcp health-check makes and closes a connection to s1 server without valid http-request

Hi Pieter, On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 10:54:32PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote: > Hi List, Willy, > > The regtest  /reg-tests/log/b0.vtc, is failing for me as shown below, > and attached: > > ***  s1    0.0 accepted fd 5 127.0.0.1 29538 > **   s1    0.0 === rxreq > s1    0.0 HTTP rx failed (fd:5

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9-dev10

Hi, HAProxy 1.9-dev10 was released on 2018/12/08. It added 68 new commits after version 1.9-dev9. No more painful changes, tons of bugs fixed already, in various places. I intend to deploy this one on haproxy.org this week-end and observe. I'll however leave HTX off for now as we've found two

Re: regtest failure for /log/b00000.vtc, tcp health-check makes and closes a connection to s1 server without valid http-request

Hi Willy, Op 8-12-2018 om 23:49 schreef Willy Tarreau: Hi Pieter, Just let me know which patch you prefer me to apply, I'm fine with your options. The patch i prefer would be 'c', to remove the 'check' from the server line. As it simply removes all possibly check related 'issues'. Willy