Re: [PATCH] REGTEST: filters: add compression test

2018-12-23 Thread PiBa-NL
Added LUA requirement into the test.. Op 23-12-2018 om 23:05 schreef PiBa-NL: Hi Frederic, As requested hereby the regtest send for inclusion into the git repository. Without randomization and with your .diff applied. Also outputting expected and actual checksum if the test fails so its clear

Re: [PATCH] REG-TEST: mailers: add new test for 'mailers' section

2018-12-23 Thread PiBa-NL
Changed subject of patch requirement to 'REGTEST'. Op 23-12-2018 om 21:17 schreef PiBa-NL: Hi List, Attached a new test to verify that the 'mailers' section is working properly. Currently with 1.9 the mailers sends thousands of mails for my setup... As the test is rather slow i have marked i

[PATCH] REGTEST: filters: add compression test

2018-12-23 Thread PiBa-NL
Hi Frederic, As requested hereby the regtest send for inclusion into the git repository. Without randomization and with your .diff applied. Also outputting expected and actual checksum if the test fails so its clear that that is the issue detected. Is it okay like this? Should the blob be bi

[PATCH] MINOR: sample: add ssl_sni_check converter

2018-12-23 Thread Moemen MHEDHBI
Hi, The attached patch adds the ssl_sni_check converter which returns true if the sample input string matches a loaded certificate's CN/SAN. This can be useful to check for example if a host header matches a loaded certificate CN/SAN before doing a redirect: frontent fe_main bind 127.0.0.1:80

[PATCH] REG-TEST: mailers: add new test for 'mailers' section

2018-12-23 Thread PiBa-NL
Hi List, Attached a new test to verify that the 'mailers' section is working properly. Currently with 1.9 the mailers sends thousands of mails for my setup... As the test is rather slow i have marked it with a starting letter 's'. Note that the test also fails on 1.6/1.7/1.8 but can be 'fixed

Re: DNS resolution problem since 1.8.14

2018-12-23 Thread Jonathan Matthews
Hey Patrick, Have you looked at the fixes in 1.8.16? They sound kinda-sorta related to your problem ... J On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 at 16:17, Patrick Valsecchi wrote: > I did a tcpdump. My config is modified to point to a local container (www) > in a docker compose (I'm trying to simplify my setup).

Re: DNS resolution problem since 1.8.14

2018-12-23 Thread Patrick Valsecchi
I did a tcpdump. My config is modified to point to a local container (www) in a docker compose (I'm trying to simplify my setup). You can see the DNS answers correctly: 16:06:00.181533 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 63816, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 68)     127.0.0.11.53 >

DNS resolution problem since 1.8.14

2018-12-23 Thread Patrick Valsecchi
Hi, Since haproxy version 1.8.14 and including the last 1.9 release, haproxy puts all my backends in MAINT after around 31s. They first work fine, but then they are put in MAINT. The logs look like that: <149>Dec 23 12:45:11 haproxy[1]: Proxy www started. <149>Dec 23 12:45:11 haproxy[1