On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 07:55:11PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Well as far as I understood the pdf one of the biggest difference is that
> Maglev is a distributed system where the consistent hash is for local system.
No, not at all. The difference is that it's designed for packet processing
Hi List,
When using compression with htx, and a slightly delayed body content it
will prefix some rubbish and corrupt the gzip header..
Below output i get with attached test.. Removing http-use-htx 'fixes'
the test.
This happens with both 1.9.0 and todays commit a2dbeb2, not sure if this
Well as far as I understood the pdf one of the biggest difference is that
Maglev is a distributed system where the consistent hash is for local system.
What I think is if consistent hash uses the peers table for balancing it could
be similar to Maglev, but I'm not a algo expert, just an Idea.
I've not used it yet with IPVS because I have nothing with a new enough
Kernel (4.18+ I think), however, isn't this quite similar to HAProxy's
consistent hash options?
Aaron
Loadbalancer.org
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 07:11:24PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Have anyone take a look into the Maglev algorithm ?
>
> This paper looks very interesting
> https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//pubs/archive/44824.pdf
Seems to be in IPVS already:
Hi.
Have anyone take a look into the Maglev algorithm ?
This paper looks very interesting
https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//pubs/archive/44824.pdf
Regards
Aleks
Hi.
I just have seen this tweet, maybe it's also interesting for you.
Subodh Iyengar (@__subodh) twitterte um 10:18 nachm. on Mi., Dez. 26, 2018:
Slides for my presentation at ACM conext on Facebook's implementation and
deployment of QUIC are now live
7 matches
Mail list logo
