Hi,
This is a friendly bot that watches fixes pending for the next haproxy-stable
release! One such e-mail is sent periodically once patches are waiting in the
last maintenance branch, and an ideal release date is computed based on the
severity of these fixes and their merge date. Responses
There is no overhead on the client side, only on the server time logged
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
Original Message
On Jun 30, 2020, 20:14, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> is that https publicly available? can you say it's url ?
>
> otherwise, https might add some overhead. can you
is that https publicly available? can you say it's url ?
otherwise, https might add some overhead. can you compare http <-- > https
performance ?
вт, 30 июн. 2020 г. в 21:32, Paul Belloc :
> it is https, I am not sure if ocsp stapling is enabled, how can I know ?
>
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original
it is https, I am not sure if ocsp stapling is enabled, how can I know ?
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
Le mardi 30 juin 2020 17:26, Илья Шипицин a écrit :
> is it https ? is ocsp stapling enabled ?
>
> вт, 30 июн. 2020 г. в 20:24, Paul Belloc :
>
>> Hello, I have been struggling on this
is it https ? is ocsp stapling enabled ?
вт, 30 июн. 2020 г. в 20:24, Paul Belloc :
> Hello, I have been struggling on this issue for some time.
>
> I am trying to monitor the total request time in haproxy 1.7.5 HTTP logs.
> My usecase is customers want to know the exact overhead of calling our
Hello, I have been struggling on this issue for some time.
I am trying to monitor the total request time in haproxy 1.7.5 HTTP logs.
My usecase is customers want to know the exact overhead of calling our service.
Sometime we have complaints that we are adding overhead, and we know that our
NFP WORKSHOPS
18 Blake Street, York YO1 8QG
Affordable Training Courses for Charities, Schools & Public Sector
Organisations
This email has been sent to haproxy@formilux.org
CLICK TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM LIST
Alternatively send a blank e-mail to unsubscr...@nfpmail2001.co.uk quoting
7 matches
Mail list logo
