Pedro Mata-Mouros Fonseca wrote:
> This is my first post into this mailing list, been following it for a
> few days. So, greetings from Portugal. I have a small doubt: I have a
> few backend sections defined in my haproxy.conf, one of each is composed
> of server1 to 4 - and all of them using the c
Are there any plans to allow federating of haproxy servers, so that they
can (for example) cut down on the number of duplicate health checks?
Currently we run two carp'd OpenBSD firewalls running haproxy, and the
second firewall currently duplicates all health checks for our
applications, which
Greetings,
This is my first post into this mailing list, been following it for a
few days. So, greetings from Portugal. I have a small doubt: I have a
few backend sections defined in my haproxy.conf, one of each is
composed of server1 to 4 - and all of them using the check keyword. In
ano
Sorry to reply to myself (bad netiquette and all), but I've just
spotted the later mail from Willy with regards to issues with the
patch - so obviously I'll keep an eye out for that issue being
resolved, and take it from there.
Thanks guys.
Chris
Quoting ch...@sargy.co.uk:
Hi,
Just as
Hi,
Just as an addition to this - is this (the HTTP-ECV patch) going to
make it into the main haproxy release at any point?
Cheers
Chris
Quoting Malcolm Turnbull :
Chris,
Someone wrote a patch, search the archives for
HTTP-ECV(Extended Content Verification) monitor
2009/6/18
Hi,
5 matches
Mail list logo