Un versement pour doubler votre argent

2010-03-19 Thread haproxy
Transformez votre moue en sourire and changez votre vie pour toujours - inscrivez-vous maintenant Http://www.vipplaysbonus.net/fr/

unsubscribe

2010-03-19 Thread Dusty Doris

Re: HAproxy tproxy problem when try to make transparent proxy

2010-03-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 07:03:47PM +0100, Daniele Genetti wrote: Hello, I have one big problem with HAproxy compiled with tproxy support. This is the situation... HAPROXY_SERVER os: ubuntu server kernel: 2.6.31 (so with tproxy support) iptables: 1.4.4 (so with tproxy support)

HAProxy 1.4.2 on z/Linux - segfaults LIST_DEL(s-list); and hangs

2010-03-19 Thread Dariusz Suchojad
Hello, first off - thank you very much for such a wonderful piece of software! I'm using HAProxy on Linux/x86 and it's been a wonderful experience so far. Things are a bit different on z/Linux, using s390 architecture. HAProxy was running very nicely for several hours and then suddenly

Re: HAproxy tproxy problem when try to make transparent proxy

2010-03-19 Thread James Little
Also for some reason if you are using the new kernel and the new iptables (as you seem to be) you need to specify the firewall mark on EVERY interface: ip rule add dev eth0 fwmark 111 lookup 100 ip rule add dev eth1 fwmark 111 lookup 100 ip rule add dev eth2 fwmark 111 lookup 100 ip rule add dev

Re: HAProxy 1.4.2 on z/Linux - segfaults LIST_DEL(s-list); and hangs

2010-03-19 Thread Dariusz Suchojad
Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi, There's something easy you can do to check if it's that : in src/stream_sock.c, there's only one recv() call. Simply check that the max value is within bounds : + if (max 0 || max b-size) + abort(); ret = recv(fd,

Re: HAproxy tproxy problem when try to make transparent proxy

2010-03-19 Thread Daniele Genetti
I verify default gw and it seems correct. I also add rules suggested, but nothing change. The error 503 Service Unavailable persist. So, now I try to do this test. 1) Without transparent proxy on HAPROXY_SERVER: netstat -ctnup | grep 192.168.1.20:80 (ok, connection established showed) on

queued health checks?

2010-03-19 Thread Greg Gard
hi, i remember somewhere in the archives mention of a plan to make health checks get queued like any other request. did that happen in 1.4.x branch with all the work to health checks. i searched the archives, but didn't turn up what i remembered. my use case is rails/mongrel with maxconn = 1 so i