Hello,
Is it possible to handle UDP load balancing with HAProxy? Particular
application here is SLB in front of multiple DNS servers.
-J
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 01:19:59AM -0400, Geoffrey Mina wrote:
Greetings,
We recently deployed HAProxy in a virtualized environment. I am having some
problems with occasional socket accept errors.
Where do you observe those errors ? I'm seeing you have nbproc 4 which you
shouldn't be
Hello Adrien,
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 12:19:47PM +0200, Adrien Desprez wrote:
Hello,
is it possible to perform different checks according to the server
destination?
no you can't, but see below.
(...)
backend www.site.fr
mode http
log global
balance roundrobin
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 04:18:33PM +0100, Laurie Young wrote:
Hi everyone
I have a problem, and I'm not sure if HAProxy can solve it
I have a range of different requests coming in on a server to port 80, and
am using HAProxy to switch them to the relevant back end servers.
Most of these
Hi Jim,
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 01:54:22PM -0500, Jim Riggs wrote:
I came across this while trying to get my new stack and configuration up and
running. A portion of my config looks like this:
backend lb.example.com
server web1 web1.example.com:80 track web1.example.com/web1
server
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 11:24:55AM -0600, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Hi Laurie,
This thread might be helpful:
http://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg00926.html
yes indeed, there are various tuning knobs depending on the OS.
Also, haproxy needs to be set up with the appropriate
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 01:03:38AM -0600, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to handle UDP load balancing with HAProxy? Particular
application here is SLB in front of multiple DNS servers.
No it is not. However, under Linux, LVS does it pretty well with a low
overhead, so this
Hello,
first, there are too many questions for a single mail, it's hard for
list subscribers to find enough time to reply to everything, and it
is likely that you'll only get partial responses.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:15:54PM +0200, eni-urgence wrote:
Hello all.
I discover haproxy few
Hi, That is useful to know
Specifically I'm looking to use HAProxy in front of a cluster of backend
servers, with lots of long running connections.
I keep hearing references on Linux to 65K max sockets, implying about 30k
max connections (2 sockets per connection - one in and one out?). This is
Excellent - this may be what we need
Can I do further http swittching in the backend (based on hostnames) or can
this only be done in the front end?
On 4 June 2010 08:56, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 04:18:33PM +0100, Laurie Young wrote:
Hi everyone
I have a
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 09:35:54AM +0100, Laurie Young wrote:
Hi, That is useful to know
Specifically I'm looking to use HAProxy in front of a cluster of backend
servers, with lots of long running connections.
I keep hearing references on Linux to 65K max sockets, implying about 30k
max
Thanks - I'm going to give this a try - but I can't find the git url to
access the latest source so I can try building 1.4.7 :-(
Sorry if i'm being dumb, my excuse is it's a Friday
On 4 June 2010 08:56, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 04:18:33PM +0100, Laurie Young
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 08:17:03AM -0400, Geoffrey Mina wrote:
Thanks for the response. Can you explain what nbproc is if I am using
it incorrectly? My VM shows 4 cores of cpu.
It was initially implemented to help bypass some platforms per-process
file-descriptor limitations. In *very rare*
subscribe
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 11:06:52AM -0600, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Dang. We've already started the implementation of HAProxy, and would
prefer to only have one SLB solution.
You see, there's never an absolute *one* SLB solution :
- you may have layer2 load balancing (etherchannel,
15 matches
Mail list logo
