On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:10:04AM -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
> I didn't really write a specification, but I think a critical part of the spec
> would be that the only guarantee about the id string is that it's unique
It's unique within a delimited perimeter. That's important. In some
contexts, it wi
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 07:58:53AM -0400, Roy Smith wrote:
> Looking at the docs, I see some lines that use "option" and some that don't.
> Is there a general rule as to when it should use "option"? Could you give me
> a use case where you would want to apply this conditionally?
Normally "opti
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 04:32:41PM -0600, Don MacArthur wrote:
> As a practice, we avoid the use of cookies.
Then what does your application use to recognize a client ?
Haproxy's cookies are just session cookies, not stored cookies. It
can even make use of the application's cookie.
> I am load ba
Hi Joel,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:29:27PM -0700, Joel Krauska wrote:
> It would be nice to be able to set an expiration timer on server
> persistence cookies set by HAProxy.
>
> A'la:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_cookie#Expires_and_Max-Age
>
> From what I can tell HAProxy is not settin
Hi Charles,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 02:42:54PM -0500, Charles Duffy wrote:
> Howdy! I'm having trouble with the haproxy reload command. The below happens
> on my VPS vendor's builds of Linux 2.6.38 but not their 2.6.35:
>
> + /usr/sbin/haproxy -D -f /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg -p /var/run/haproxy.pi
Hi Mike,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:12:21PM -0700, Mike Oxford wrote:
> >From what I can tell via Docs + The Great Google I see that HAProxy
> seems to work in three ways for HTTP/1.1 persistant connections.
>
> 1) Full keep alive, 1:1 mapped client-server. All requests go to the same
> server.
Good to know, thanks Jeremy.
Cheers,
Guy
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Jeremy Hinegardner
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:37:22AM -0700, g...@desgames.com wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I got an error while trying to build haproxy 1.4 on a system running
>> CentOS 5.5 x86_64. I have both the i38
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:37:22AM -0700, g...@desgames.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I got an error while trying to build haproxy 1.4 on a system running
> CentOS 5.5 x86_64. I have both the i386 and x86_64 versions of pcre
> installed, but if I try to build haproxy using ARCH=x86_64 with PCRE
> suppo
Thank you very much for taking the time to review my information and give so
much detailed feed back!
I implemented the changes and the proxy now responds as designed. In
production testing I found another item I need to attend to.
My original requirements did not include maintaining session aff
Howdy! I'm having trouble with the haproxy reload command. The below happens
on my VPS vendor's builds of Linux 2.6.38 but not their 2.6.35:
+ /usr/sbin/haproxy -D -f /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg -p /var/run/haproxy.pid
-sf 27913
[ALERT] 089/191251 (27947) : Starting frontend pgsql-master-in: cannot b
It would be nice to be able to set an expiration timer on server
persistence cookies set by HAProxy.
A'la:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_cookie#Expires_and_Max-Age
From what I can tell HAProxy is not setting an expires window for cookies.
Is this a feature that I just can't find in the doc
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:37 PM, g...@desgames.com wrote:
> /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libpcre.so when searching for
> -lpcre
> /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libpcre.a when searching for
> -lpcre
>
It's looking in /usr/lib, which only 32bit.
Try forcing it with U
Hi,
do you need shared pcre? if not, try USE_STATIC_PCRE=1 then.
Cheers,
Kai
Hi all,
I got an error while trying to build haproxy 1.4 on a system running
CentOS 5.5 x86_64. I have both the i386 and x86_64 versions of pcre
installed, but if I try to build haproxy using ARCH=x86_64 with PCRE
support, I get the following errors right at the end of the process:
/usr/bin/ld: s
My intent was just to have a unique string that could be searched for in the
logs. Building it by smashing together the hostid, pid, timestamp, etc, was
just a fast hack to get something unique. I made one attempt to compact the
string by running it through md5, but then I realized that the mo
Looking at the docs, I see some lines that use "option" and some that don't.
Is there a general rule as to when it should use "option"? Could you give me a
use case where you would want to apply this conditionally?
As far as stripping headers, one of the problems is that the unique id
inserti
Hi,
Thx Roxy, this would be very useful to have. I'm just wondering about
the id format. If all the "fields" correspond to something meaningful,
like host_id, pid, timestamp, etcetera, would it make sense to have
them in a more human readable format?
Regards,
Bart
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:30 AM
This would be useful, but having a format similar to what's currently
used for forwardfor would be nice:
option uniqueid [{if | unless} ] [ header ]
I would also like to be sure that any incoming values for the header
could be stripped (using reqidel) and still have the new one added
properly.
18 matches
Mail list logo