haproxy development

2011-10-03 Thread Dan Kuebrich
Hi all, We've been working on a small project to custom-instrument parts of haproxy (http mode only) and would like the help of someone experienced in haproxy development to consult and hack on the code. This would be a paid freelance gig with a well-defined spec. If interested, please reply

500s with 1.4.18 and 1.5d7

2011-10-03 Thread Hank A. Paulson
I am not sure if these counts are exceeding the never threshold 500 when haproxy encounters an unrecoverable internal error, such as a memory allocation failure, which should never happen I am not sure what I can do to troubleshoot this since it is in prod :( Is there a way to set

Re: 500s with 1.4.18 and 1.5d7

2011-10-03 Thread Brane F. Gračnar
On Monday 03 of October 2011 20:09:17 Hank A. Paulson wrote: I am not sure if these counts are exceeding the never threshold 500 when haproxy encounters an unrecoverable internal error, such as a memory allocation failure, which should never happen I am not sure what I can do

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy 1.5-dev7

2011-10-03 Thread Baptiste
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: Hi all, Five months have elapsed since 1.5-dev6. A massive amount of changes was merged since then. Most of them were cleanups and optimizations. A number of changes were dedicated to making listeners more autonomous. The

Re: 500s with 1.4.18 and 1.5d7

2011-10-03 Thread Hank A. Paulson
On 10/3/11 12:19 PM, Brane F. Gračnar wrote: On Monday 03 of October 2011 20:09:17 Hank A. Paulson wrote: I am not sure if these counts are exceeding the never threshold 500 when haproxy encounters an unrecoverable internal error, such as a memory allocation failure, which

Re: 500s with 1.4.18 and 1.5d7

2011-10-03 Thread Baptiste
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Hank A. Paulson h...@spamproof.nospammail.net wrote: On 10/3/11 12:19 PM, Brane F. Gračnar wrote: On Monday 03 of October 2011 20:09:17 Hank A. Paulson wrote: I am not sure if these counts are exceeding the never threshold     500  when haproxy encounters an

haproxy - kernel socket and # files limits

2011-10-03 Thread Alex Davies
Hi, I am running haproxy 1.4.18 on RHEL6 (64 bit). I am trying to run a large number of connections (I have long pooling backends), ideally several hundred k. My servers have 24G RAM and are doing nothing else. I have two problems. Firstly, if I increase teh nofile hard limit in

Re: 500s with 1.4.18 and 1.5d7

2011-10-03 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 11:17:14PM +0200, Baptiste wrote: On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Hank A. Paulson h...@spamproof.nospammail.net wrote: On 10/3/11 12:19 PM, Brane F. Gra??nar wrote: On Monday 03 of October 2011 20:09:17 Hank A. Paulson wrote: I am not sure if these counts are

Re: haproxy - kernel socket and # files limits

2011-10-03 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Alex, On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 01:38:40AM +0100, Alex Davies wrote: Hi, I am running haproxy 1.4.18 on RHEL6 (64 bit). I am trying to run a large number of connections (I have long pooling backends), ideally several hundred k. My servers have 24G RAM and are doing nothing else. I have