Hello,
I reply to myself.
I think that is because the tcp-request need a condition for doing the track.
Tranks,
Ricardo F
> From: ri...@hotmail.com
> To: haproxy@formilux.org
> Subject: Track headers with tcp-request in listen only work with "if HTT
Sebastian,
1. when you talk to a ML, you should say 'Hi'
2. when you talk to a ML, you shouldn't send HTML mails
Now, I can see you have absolutely no experience with Load-Balancing.
Here are a few clues for you:
- when you have a 503 error, then no need to think, it means ALL the
servers from th
Ok, I disabled the health check and it's working now, so it's definitly
a problem of haproxy shuting down the backends.
On 30.08.2013 05:55, Sebastian Fohler wrote:
Some help, would be to disable the health check for the time being, is
that possible.
At least it would be a quickfix.
On 30.08.
Some help, would be to disable the health check for the time being, is
that possible.
At least it would be a quickfix.
On 30.08.2013 05:25, Sebastian Fohler wrote:
Is there some simple way to find out why I get this error from my
haproxy cluster?
503 Service Unavailable
No server is avail
Is there some simple way to find out why I get this error from my
haproxy cluster?
503 Service Unavailable
No server is available to handle this request.
It looks like all my backend servers are down. Even in pools which are
shown as up in my stats.
How can I debug that sensible?
Thank yo
Hi William,
(apologies for the high volume in this thread)
> haproxy 1.4 and pre 2a4a44f0f9f behavior (expected):
> every syslog message ends with \n
>
> post 2a4a44f0f9f (REORG: log: split send_log function) behavior:
> every syslog message ends with \n + 1 random character
>
> post bfb099c3b3f
Hi William,
sorry, there is another commit involved here. This is what I see:
haproxy 1.4 and pre 2a4a44f0f9f behavior (expected):
every syslog message ends with \n
post 2a4a44f0f9f (REORG: log: split send_log function) behavior:
every syslog message ends with \n + 1 random character
post bfb0
Hi William,
> I can't reproduce the bug, how did you compile HAProxy?
> What is your configuration file?
I've trimmed this down to a very basic setup:
$ make TARGET=linux26 CPU=native
$ ./haproxy -vv
HA-Proxy version 1.5-dev19-55 2013/08/13
Copyright 2000-2013 Willy Tarreau
Build
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRENDS IN ECONOMICS MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY IJTEMT invites you to submit your research paper for publishing in Volume II, Issue IV ( AUGUST 2013). CALL FOR PAPERS VOLUME II, ISSUE IV
www.ijtemt.org
INDEXED IN: Google Scholar, .docstoc, slideshare, Scribd, J-Gate, Academi
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:18:46AM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> > Is this happen randomly or can you pin point this to specifc requests, maybe
> > errors/timeouts? How can we reproduce this?
>
> Nevermind, its easily reproducible (just generate some syslog messages).
>
> The whole thing seems ran
Very good guid, I will follow it.
Thanks a lot !
Regards,
Kevin C
- Mail original -
> De: "Ozgur Tas"
> À: "Thomas Heil"
> Cc: "Lukas Tribus" , "Kevin C" ,
> haproxy@formilux.org
> Envoyé: Jeudi 29 Août 2013 15:37:37
> Objet: RE: Load Balance individual requests
>
> I didn’t know t
Hi,
We want to maintain stickiness to a backed server based on host header so
"balance hdr(host)" works pretty well for us, however as soon at the backend
hits max connection, requests pile up in the queue eventually timeout with a
503 and sQ in the logs. Is there a way to redispatch the requests
I didn’t know this one, was aware of the general guidelines.
This is a very nice guide, fully detailed.
From: Thomas Heil [mailto:h...@terminal-consulting.de]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 5:06 PM
To: Ozgur Tas
Cc: Lukas Tribus; Kevin C; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Load Balance individual
Hi Nick,
> I'm running CentOS 6 with a 2.6.18 kernel
> Linux 2.6.18-308.8.2.el5.028stab101.1 #1 SMP Sun Jun 24 20:25:35 MSD 2012
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
CentOS 6.0 should have a 2.6.32 kernel, are you sure this is CentOS 6?
Is this a CentOS 5 installation that has been upgraded to Cen
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Amyas wrote:
> Nick Jennings writes:
>
> > I'm running CentOS 6 with a 2.6.18 kernel, aside from a few
> > additional packages via the EPEL, there
> > are no significant modifications.
> > # uname -aLinux 2.6.18-308.8.2.el5.028stab101.1 #1 SMP
>
> That might be
15 matches
Mail list logo
