Great. Thanks.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
as much as you need!
No limitation.
Baptiste
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Avatar avatar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
How many configuration blocks (listen,frontend,backend) in haproxy
configuration
I know you are asking about code development, but for configuration test we use
Vagrant to spin up multi-node test environments.
Sent from my iPhone
Robert Snyder
rsny...@me.com
814.876.0912
On Oct 20, 2013, at 2:02 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:00:16AM
Hello,
I am using many haproxy instances, for separated projects.
This is causing a high cpu usage, and a high load in the OS up to 12.00 and
so on.
The question is, using just one instance, would reduce the CPU load, or it
would make no difference at all ?
Also, is there a way to
Hi Fred,
I imagine that your high load is due to running many instances of
HAProxy, but hard to be 100% without all the information.
Load indicates that there are processes waiting to execute, so by
reducing the number of HAProxy processes you should see a reduced load
(but still high cpu
Hello,
Are there any parameters that could be touched to potentially help with the
cpu usage ?
And the -sf parameter, will kill the old one while keeping the new one,
that's it ?
-Mensagem original-
De: Jeff Zellner [mailto:j...@olark.com]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 21 de outubro de
-sf will not actually kill the old process(es) immediately. They'll
end when they are no longer handling the currently connected clients
they have, but the new process will handle all new connections.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Fred Pedrisa fredhp...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Are there
Hello,
So, I can run all my instances in just one process and work with it this
way, by using -sf right ?
-Mensagem original-
De: Jeff Zellner [mailto:j...@olark.com]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 21 de outubro de 2013 14:59
Para: Fred Pedrisa
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Assunto: Re: High CPU
Yes you could have all different applications in one process/configuration.
When you 'reload' using -sf you'd have 2 processes for a while
(depends on if you have long-lived connections or not). The old
processes scheduled to die will typically take a lot less CPU, because
they are handling only
Hello,
Would this cause a port conflict or anything like this ?
Or when you use -sf, it automatically 'unbind' the port on the old process,
allowing it only for the new one ?
-Mensagem original-
De: Jeff Zellner [mailto:j...@olark.com]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 21 de outubro de 2013
Hi Fred,
I am using many haproxy instances, for separated projects.
This is causing a high cpu usage, and a high load in the OS up to 12.00
and so on.
The question is, using just one instance, would reduce the CPU load, or
it would make no difference at all ?
There is no way we can tell
indeed this way it works... thx !
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 05:38:08PM +0200, Steven Le Roux wrote:
Great willy as usual :)
BUT :)
There is still a / I can't remove... : got search=/arg instead of
search=arg
The /
Hi, Lukas.
We are speaking about :
FreeBSD 9.2 - Dual Xeon E5-2650 - 32 GB RAM.
Haproxy 1.4 (Latest)
30.000~35.000 concurrent connections. About 200~300 Megabit/s. In totality.
Sincerely,
Fred
-Mensagem original-
De: Lukas Tribus [mailto:luky...@hotmail.com]
Enviada em:
Curso Taller Especializado - Control de la Planta de
ProducciónMedellín29 y 30Octubre de 2013
El control de la planta de producción es un
elemento crucial en el proceso de la manufactura, ya que tiene el poder de
hacer o
Hello,
I was hoping someone could help me out here, I'm fairly new to haproxy and
what I think I need should be fairly simple to do for someone that has some
experience with it, but for me, I am not having the best of luck.
*Here is my scenario:*
I have an haproxy server set up that I want to
Hi Fred,
FreeBSD 9.2 - Dual Xeon E5-2650 - 32 GB RAM.
Haproxy 1.4 (Latest)
30.000~35.000 concurrent connections. About 200~300 Megabit/s. In totality.
Alright, but we still need to know what haproxy does in this box.
Can you post your configuration and explain what it does? Also we need
Hello,
I am using a 10 Gbps Intel 520-DA2 NIC.
The cpu usage in top vary per process we have something like :
Haproxy - 93%
Haproxy - 85%
Haproxy - 50%
Haproxy - 43%
Haproxy - 32%
Haproxy - 20%
Haproxy - 15%
Haproxy - 5%
Haproxy - 1%
About 30-40 Processes.
I am just using it as a tcp proxy,
Hi Fred,
I am using a 10 Gbps Intel 520-DA2 NIC.
The cpu usage in top vary per process we have something like :
Haproxy - 93%
Haproxy - 85%
Haproxy - 50%
Haproxy - 43%
Haproxy - 32%
Haproxy - 20%
Haproxy - 15%
Haproxy - 5%
Haproxy - 1%
About 30-40 Processes.
I am just using it as
Hello,
Yes, this is why I was speaking with Jeff about this.
Because I suppose that these processes have a default loop, that uses a
certain amount of CPU (kQueue implementation)
Example config :
global
log 127.0.0.1 local0
log 127.0.0.1 local1 notice
maxconn 16384
Hi,
Yes, this is why I was speaking with Jeff about this.
Because I suppose that these processes have a default loop, that uses a
certain amount of CPU (kQueue implementation)
Its not busy polling, if thats what you are referring to. CPU usage should
be low with kqueue (because its fully
Hi,
Yes, the current version (for my usage) is really stable.
However, you are right, because too many processes, will create too many
threads, assuming I have just 16 Physical Cores...
Do you believe on a good CPU usage decrease, by switching to one process
only ?
-Mensagem original-
Hi,
Yes, the current version (for my usage) is really stable.
However, you are right, because too many processes, will create too many
threads, assuming I have just 16 Physical Cores...
Do you believe on a good CPU usage decrease, by switching to one process
only ?
I can't guarantee it,
Hello,
Ok.
This is the top output :
2748 root1 870 30396K 21656K CPU88 28.0H 49.17% haproxy
2726 root1 450 38588K 32128K CPU24 16 21.1H 33.79% haproxy
2718 root1 390 26300K 17464K kqread 28 807:21 29.98% haproxy
2752 root1 380 30396K
Hello, Robert.
After you are signed up, all you need to do is send a regular mail to this
address :
haproxy@formilux.org
The diffusion of the message will be done automatically and all members will
receive it.
I believe since it recognizes you as a member it should work like this !
I am not
Hello, Guys.
Robert Snyder is having issues with the mailing list, he is trying to join
it, but the system says he is already a member, when he try to send an
e-mail, he gets this as reply :
From: mailto:haproxy+ow...@formilux.org haproxy+ow...@formilux.org
Subject: Post to
Dear User,
All Hotmail customers have been upgraded to
Outlook.com. Your Hotmail Account
services have expired.Due to our new system upgrade to Outlook. In order for it to remain active
follow the link Sign in Re-activate your account to Outlook.
https://account.live.com
Thanks,
The
Unsubscribe
Sent from my iPhone
26 matches
Mail list logo
