2013/12/2 Pawel Veselov :
> Here is my first attempt at this:
>
> http://pastebin.com/xXfZJf3f
>
> The diff is over http://git.1wt.eu/git/haproxy-1.4.git/ ref
> eb9632f7c6ae675bdee4c82eb0d298ba7f37fc52
>
> To enable DNS checks on a server, the host name defined configuration should
> be suffixed wi
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:20:05PM +, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
> Forgot to reply to all:
>
> Willy,
>
> This looks good to me and make sense.
> Long term it will be more flexible this way.
Perfect. I have some work to finish on the check subsystem and
then I'll see what I can do.
Thanks!
Wil
Forgot to reply to all:
Willy,
This looks good to me and make sense.
Long term it will be more flexible this way.
On 4 December 2013 18:17, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Malcolm,
>
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:05:41PM +, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
>> Hi Willy,
>>
>> Sorry for the lack of r
Hi Malcolm,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:05:41PM +, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> Sorry for the lack of response from the Loadbalancer.org end, I must
> confess we were getting a bit confused by the descriptions :-).
I'm not surprized! I got even more confused when trying to debug so
On 12/04/2013 02:10 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
We happen to have another CPU we purchased to be good with highly
>threaded Java apps: Intel Xeon CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz
>
>It also has a L2 cache per core. This CPU has performed significantly
>better in both "many" and "a few" threaded workloads.
On 12/03/2013 04:07 PM, Chris Burroughs wrote:
This could just be me not being adept at email patches. Sorry if this
is obvious but is this supposed to apply against 1.4 or 1.5?
To answer my own question this applies against 1.5. I'm not sure of the
feasibility or desirability of backporting
On 11/28/2013 03:10 AM, Annika Wickert wrote:
Is this a normal behaviour?
http://imgur.com/I7sRWy2
A graph of similar behavior at nbproc=3. Anecdotally the variance seems
to be higher under lower loads.
Hi Willy,
Sorry for the lack of response from the Loadbalancer.org end, I must
confess we were getting a bit confused by the descriptions :-).
The only thing in mu mind to be aware of is the design decision of the
agent to report DOWN or DRAIN on every agent request until the agent
starts respond
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:41:55PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
> Please check the attachment for the lastest patch.
That's perfect ! I just applied it, thanks Godbach!
Willy
Hi Willy,
On 2013/12/4 17:03, Willy Tarreau wrote:
It seems that the return value of si_conn_send() will not be used
anymore. Furthermore, si_conn_send_cb() does not need to check
conn->flags for errors since it will return directly after calling
si_conn_send().
Sorry for not being clear abou
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 04:37:51PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
> Please check the attachment for patch 0001.
OK first patch applied, thanks.
> >So it should also be simplified this way :
> >
> > si_conn_send(si->conn);
> > if (si->conn->flags & CO_FL_ERROR) {
> > /* Write error on t
Hi Willy,
On 2013/12/4 15:02, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:50:36AM +0800, Godbach wrote:
Hi Willy,
Please check the attachments for the two patches.
Patch 0001: DOC: stick-table can be declared in such sections as
frontend, listen and backend
OK in principle
Cliquez ici pour lire cet e-mail dans votre navigateur.Livraison gratuite retour GRATUIT**hommes | femmes | accessoires | NOUVEAUTÉS | VOir les marquesLES SOLDES SONT LÀ JUSQU'À -70%Hop hop hop, on prépare nos cadeaux de noël sans stress
13 matches
Mail list logo
