Ofertas de hoy en Mar del Plata
precio
descuento
ahorro
$ 140.00
48 %
$ 130
48% Dto. Asesoría legal a Familias, Comercios y PYMES.
Somos un grupo de abogados que ofrece sus servicios de asesoría legal así como
tramitación vía judicial de cualquier tipo… seguir
Hi David,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 05:54:13PM -0700, David Birdsong wrote:
Before or after haproxy setuid's?
before. UIDs are switched after the chroot which is performed after
all the config is parsed.
Willy
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:37:36AM -0500, Julien Vehent wrote:
On 2014-03-07 08:27, Julien Vehent wrote:
Update configuration.txt to use the correct format string in the
unique-id documentation.
Argh! I lowercased one too many (%Ts != %ts). The correct patch is
below.
Applied, thank
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:05:40PM -0700, Xie Qingshan wrote:
Please could you fix your mailer so that it sends a correct date
with your e-mails ? And please don't reuse old posts to send a
new question, it makes it much harder to follow threads.
Thanks,
Willy
The patch is integrated in the current dev version.
Thierry
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:39:15 +0100
William Lallemand wlallem...@irq6.net wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:30:27 -0400
Julien Vehent jul...@linuxwall.info wrote:
Thanks Thierry ! It is trivial indeed, but like you I was concerned
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:48:01 -0400
Julien Vehent jul...@linuxwall.info wrote:
Hi everyone,
This seem to be a bug that I just ran into: when %ID is used in a
log-format, but unique-id-format is not defined, then everything after
%ID gets truncated from the logs.
Example:
== normal
Hi Roel,
Let say there are currently some developments in that way.
It won't be part of HAProxy, but rather a third party daemon
interacting deeply with HAProxy.
What do you mean by OTP?
Baptiste
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Roel Cuppen r...@cuppie.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know
Title: Document sans nom
Cliquez ici pour lire cet e-mail dans votre navigateur. Gagnez 2400 de bons d'achat Bonjour Nom Prenom, Vous avez t slectionn pour remporter un chèque de 2400 à dpenser dans le supermarch près de chez vous. Alimentation, Electromnager, High Tech,
Hi Baptiste,
Many thanks for your explination
What kind of daemon is it ?
OTP = One Time Password.
Kind regards,
Roel
2014-03-18 11:03 GMT+01:00 Baptiste bed...@gmail.com:
Hi Roel,
Let say there are currently some developments in that way.
It won't be part of HAProxy, but rather a
I was wondering if there were ever any thoughts about adding
module/plugin support to haproxy.
The plugin would be used for adding features to haproxy that are beyond
the scope of haproxy's core focus (fast simple load balancing).
Reading the recent radius authentication thread surprised me. I
Well, I'm currently writing a piece of code which stands behind
HAProxy and whose purpose is to authenticate a user.
Once authenticated, it updates HAProxy who, in turn, let the user
browse the application and sets authentication requirement on the fly.
I think OTP will be possible :)
Still a
Hi Baptiste,
Your third party daemon interacting deeply with HAProxy whets my curiosity :)
Do you think this way could be used to provide an API to haproxy ?
(e.g. dynamicaly provision a server in a backend) is it a low level
API being provided by haproxy ?
For high insertion rate it could
I'm assuming it'll be generic authentication. What information will be
made available to the auth daemon? Just the Authorization header?
I would love a feature that allowed any/multiple header to be passed
through. We use haproxy on an API service, which all incoming requests
must pass in a key
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Steven Le Roux ste...@le-roux.info wrote:
Hi Baptiste,
Your third party daemon interacting deeply with HAProxy whets my curiosity
:)
Do you think this way could be used to provide an API to haproxy ?
(e.g. dynamicaly provision a server in a backend) is it a
For now, I'm authenticating users through a web form. (this is still POC phase).
I want to be able to authenticate users through Authentication header too.
And why not the situation you're describing, if it makes sense for third party.
For now, any unauthenticated user is redirected to my daemon
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Patrick Hemmer hapr...@stormcloud9.net wrote:
Reading the recent radius authentication thread surprised me. I never would
have expected that to be something haproxy would support. But I think it
would make sense as a plugin.
-Patrick
HAProxy does not support
Title: Vetolia : assurance animaux
Cliquez ici pour lire cet e-mail dans votre navigateur. Ce site est produit par ECA-Assurances. ECA-assurances, europenne de courtage d'assurances, un des leaders du courtage en
Hi,
I've ready every Haproxy/SPDY tutorial and I have the latest version of
Open SSL and I'm using the latest 1.5 dev build.
Everything looks find and I can get a SPDY connection on an upstream ports
(bound to port 444) but the local port uses plain SSL as opposed to SPDY.
I can't see any error
Hi,
I was wondering if you'd given any more thought to this feature?
To summarise:
- we are using a backend service that has both synchronous and async threads.
- it has its own internal queuing
- as soon as haproxy gets the first byte the body we know the backend service
is able to accept
Hi,
We are using HAProxy 1.5dev22 on linux machine.
Added acl rule for geolocation feature for routing traffic based on country
code . But getting below error when trying to start haproxy
[ALERT] 077/050608 (16394) : parsing [WebsiteHAProxy.cfg:31] : error
detected while parsing ACL 'acl_in' :
20 matches
Mail list logo
