[PATCH] FEATURE Implementing send-proxy version 2

As a foundation for extending the proxy-protocol to include additional information, I've implemented version 2 of the proxy protocol. As we discussed in the "Extending PROXY protocol for SSL" thread, I made one change to the protocol. Version and Command are combined into one byte. Length is now

Re: Active/passive multiple services problems

Hi Nathan, Why not simply using a single frontend with two binds pointing to one backend? It would do the trick. Concerning checking, you can use the tcp-check feature to ensure both ports are available on each server. Baptiste On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Nathan Reilly wrote: > Hello all,

[PATCH] two minor patches about typo and code style

Hi Willy, Please check the atthachments for two minor patches about typo and code style fix. -- Best Regards, Godbach From 3013eada648ee4134c27e0a38d75e4cc4e5f97d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Godbach Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 21:42:41 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] DOC: fix typo "a intermediate CA

L'assurance auto pour tous les conducteurs

Title: Assurance Auto pour tous les conducteurs ! Cliquez ici pour lire cet e-mail dans votre navigateur. Assurance Auto

Active/passive multiple services problems

Hello all, I have a situation that I have been trying to get working for days, yet can't seem to get there. There are two sets of requirements, I can get either requirements working in isolation, but not together. First requirement is I need an active/passive failover pair, and in the case of fail