Haproxy manage websocket connection - thank you

2014-05-11 Thread David Rivera

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.5-dev25

2014-05-11 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:42:50PM +0200, Baptiste wrote: On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Cyril Bonté cyril.bo...@free.fr wrote: I think the behaviour has changed since dev23. I've not tested to verify it but it may be related to the 2 commits :

RE: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.5-dev25

2014-05-11 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi Willy, Hi all, we're almost done! Now the bind-process mess is fixed so that we now support per-listener process binding using the process bind keyword, which ensures that we won't need to change the config format during the stable release if we want to slightly improve it. And that

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.5-dev25

2014-05-11 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Lukas, On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 09:47:58PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote: Nice release, all those small new features are extremely useful :) Yeah I know, that's why I decided to attack them before the release :-) Btw, not really related to dev25, but when compiling with -O3 I see the following

RE: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.5-dev25

2014-05-11 Thread Lukas Tribus
Did you force any specific cflags on your makefile ? By default we build with -fno-strict-aliasing specifically to avoid this. Ah, I see whats going on. I specified CFLAGS on the command line via: make CFLAGS=-g -O3 [...] Which is overwriting a lot of things in the Makefile, including

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.5-dev25

2014-05-11 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 10:04:24PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote: Did you force any specific cflags on your makefile ? By default we build with -fno-strict-aliasing specifically to avoid this. Ah, I see whats going on. I specified CFLAGS on the command line via: make CFLAGS=-g -O3 [...]

Re: Some thoughts about redispatch

2014-05-11 Thread Dmitry Sivachenko
Hello, thanks for your efforts on stabilizing -dev version, it looks rather solid now. Let me try to revive an old topic in hope to get rid of my old local patch I must use for production builds. Thanks :) On 28 нояб. 2012 г., at 18:10, Dmitry Sivachenko trtrmi...@gmail.com wrote: Hello!

Re: Some thoughts about redispatch

2014-05-11 Thread Dmitry Sivachenko
Looks like attach got stripped, attaching now for real so it is easy to understand what I am talking about. --- session.c.orig 2012-11-22 04:11:33.0 +0400 +++ session.c 2012-11-22 16:15:04.0 +0400 @@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ static int sess_update_st_cer(struct ses * bit

[PATCH 2/2] OPTIM: stats: avoid the calculation of a useless link on tracking servers in maintenance

2014-05-11 Thread Cyril Bonté
Commit f465994198 removed the via link when a tracking server is in maintenance, but still calculated an empty link that no one can use. We can safely remove it. --- src/dumpstats.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/dumpstats.c b/src/dumpstats.c index

[PATCH 1/2] BUG/MINOR: stats: fix a typo on a closing tag for a server tracking another one

2014-05-11 Thread Cyril Bonté
The via column includes a link to the tracked server but instead of closing the link with a /a tag, a new tag is opened. This typo should also be backported to 1.4 --- src/dumpstats.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/dumpstats.c b/src/dumpstats.c index

Re: [PATCH 2/2] OPTIM: stats: avoid the calculation of a useless link on tracking servers in maintenance

2014-05-11 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:10:19PM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote: Commit f465994198 removed the via link when a tracking server is in maintenance, but still calculated an empty link that no one can use. We can safely remove it. (...) Both patches applied, thank you Cyril. Willy

RE: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.5-dev25

2014-05-11 Thread Lukas Tribus
No it's simpler, just define a new set of per-CPU options like I do for development : make -j 4 CC=gcc TARGET=linux2628 CPU=native CPU_CFLAGS.native=-O0 Thanks! Lukas

la séduction n'aura plus aucun secret pour vous

2014-05-11 Thread ALEX SEDUCTION
Title: Alex coach sduction Cliquez ici pour lire cet e-mail dans votre navigateur. Elle est Inaccessible? Raison de plus pour l’Aborder !

SSL Client Certificate Based ACL

2014-05-11 Thread SEPAROVIC, Jason (Jason)** CTR **
Hi, I'm wondering how I can set up a simple ACL that is based on a field in the Subject DN of the cert. I want to restrict access to the backend matching %[ssl_c_s_dn(uid)] as part of the URL. Example: URL for UID = 1234 would match /abc/1234/xyz I've tried: acl acl_uid url_reg