Hi
Thanks for your reply.
After reading the doc of the option this option is usefull but I'm not sur
for my case.
I fact the 408 are received immediatly, with no delay or timeout when
browsing the website.
I indeed with the option still 408 errors
Maybe any other ideas ?
2014-05-22 19:29
Hi,
Hi
Thanks for your reply.
After reading the doc of the option this option is usefull but I'm not
sur for my case.
I fact the 408 are received immediatly, with no delay or timeout when
browsing the website.
I indeed with the option still 408 errors
Maybe any other ideas ?
Well, your log lines says that the response was generated because the
timeout client has expired...
Last suggestion for now would to apply the patch porposed by Willy and
reported by Lukas.
Bapitste
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Kevin Maziere ke...@kbrwadventure.com wrote:
Hi
Thanks for
Le 22/05/2014 21:45, Mepstein a écrit :
Hi
HA-Proxy version 1.5-dev25-a339395 2014/05/10
we experience also high 408 rate but we use an old version 1.5.19 so i
do not know for sure if it is us, the haproxy or a simple high rate of
bad clients coming at us. But the recent 2 suject opened
hello there,
Could you tell me if those packages comes from the haproxy team ?
from the packages:
Maintainer: Debian HAProxy Maintainers
pkg-haproxy-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
it seems so, just wanted to be sure :)
Regards,
Ghislain.
Hi Ghislain,
On 14:01 Fri 23 May , Ghislain wrote:
hello there,
Could you tell me if those packages comes from the haproxy team ? from the
packages:
It depends on what you mean by the haproxy team. They come from the
team that maintains the package in Debian itself, that means Debian
Hi Matt,
I'm Ccing the ML since the answer can interest everybody here.
Thanks for you explanation... I found something indeed on the devel version
yesterday, you can also remove this way I saw ?
yes, you can delete content from a map thanks to the socket or through
information found in HTTP
Ghislain,
408 in logs is not a big deal and can be avoided by the option dontlognull.
The problem is when the 408 is printed into the browser.
Baptiste
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Ghislain gad...@aqueos.com wrote:
Le 22/05/2014 21:45, Mepstein a écrit :
Hi
HA-Proxy version
Hi
I've just applied the first patch, here are the debug log :
In the logs :
2014-05-23T12:03:20+00:00 images-access haproxy[13409]:
127.0.0.1:56596[23/May/2014:12:03:17.972] ipv4-yyy-443~
ipv4-yyy-443/NOSRV
-1/-1/-1/-1/2041 408 212 - - cR-- 9/3/0/0/0 0/0 BADREQ
2014-05-23T12:03:20+00:00
Kevin,
Do you (still) see 408 errors printed in the browser???
Baptiste
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Kevin Maziere ke...@kbrwadventure.com wrote:
Hi
I've just applied the first patch, here are the debug log :
In the logs :
2014-05-23T12:03:20+00:00 images-access haproxy[13409]:
Yes
Each error is reported in the browser.
Kévin
2014-05-23 14:34 GMT+02:00 Baptiste bed...@gmail.com:
Kevin,
Do you (still) see 408 errors printed in the browser???
Baptiste
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Kevin Maziere ke...@kbrwadventure.com
wrote:
Hi
I've just applied the
Hi
So the patch on the dev25 is just adding
s-req-flags = ~CF_READ_TIMEOUT;
line previous and before aren't exactly the same than on the patch file, I
do imagine it's because it was for dev22.
So now both patch are applied.
2014-05-23T12:56:32+00:00 servername haproxy[23245]:
Hi,
OK, that is a very good explanation!
It's also very flexible in my opinion.
Does hsproxy give a reply/callback after adding/removing ? I'm not sure but
I thought it did.
I also did a reply-all this time, sorry for last time!
Cheers,
Matt
2014-05-23 14:07 GMT+02:00 Baptiste
There is no reply, it is silently performed.
Baptiste
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Matt . yamakasi@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
OK, that is a very good explanation!
It's also very flexible in my opinion.
Does hsproxy give a reply/callback after adding/removing ? I'm not sure but
I
It is not provided by us (HAProxy.com) if this is what you mean.
Baptiste
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Apollon Oikonomopoulos
apoi...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Ghislain,
On 14:01 Fri 23 May , Ghislain wrote:
hello there,
Could you tell me if those packages comes from the haproxy team
BTW it seems that Chrone on Ubuntu is not affected, but on mac/windows it
is.
2014-05-23 15:02 GMT+02:00 Kevin Maziere ke...@kbrwadventure.com:
Hi
So the patch on the dev25 is just adding
s-req-flags = ~CF_READ_TIMEOUT;
line previous and before aren't exactly the same than on the patch
So when you remove a line and there is no line like it... just nothing
happens as it should ?
But what if you add one that is already there ? Will it be added twice ? If
so and you do a remove will both be removed ?
2014-05-23 15:22 GMT+02:00 Baptiste bed...@gmail.com:
There is no reply, it
Hi Kevin,
[guys, please could you stop top-posting, it's a total mess to try to
respond to this thread, I cannot easily take out the useless parts,
thanks].
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:35:21PM +0200, Kevin Maziere wrote:
2014-05-23 14:34 GMT+02:00 Baptiste bed...@gmail.com:
Kevin,
Do
Hello,
I wanted to make a graph with average answer time in nagios that takes only
the last 5 mn of the log. Filtering the log before using halog was too
slow, so I added that filter to halog.
The patch attached to this mail is a proposal to add a new option : -time
[min][:max]
The values are
You can set a map entry, it will erase then create the entry.
And HAProxy will take it into account on the fly, without doing anything.
You could even forward traffic to your webservers and let haproxy
learn the redirect on the fly.
Remember, HAProxy is art:
I like art! Thanks!!
2014-05-23 16:34 GMT+02:00 Baptiste bed...@gmail.com:
You can set a map entry, it will erase then create the entry.
And HAProxy will take it into account on the fly, without doing anything.
You could even forward traffic to your webservers and let haproxy
learn the
Hello Olivier,
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 04:44:59PM +0200, Olivier Burgard wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to make a graph with average answer time in nagios that takes only
the last 5 mn of the log. Filtering the log before using halog was too
slow, so I added that filter to halog.
The patch
Hi all!
I've just finished re-arranging the agent-check to support up/down separately
from the weight and from the administrative state (ready/drain/maint). It
required significant changes to the rest of the check system, but in the end
it was really worth it because now servers have their own
On 17:10 Fri 23 May , Ghislain wrote:
Le 23/05/2014 15:23, Baptiste a écrit :
It is not provided by us (HAProxy.com) if this is what you mean.
Baptiste
yes that's what i meant. Thanks for both answer and thanks for the product,
and the packages !
In any case from my high throne
❦ 23 mai 2014 17:10 +0200, Ghislain gad...@aqueos.com :
/etc/apt/preferences.d/haproxy
Package: haproxy
Pin: origin haproxy.debian.net, version 1.5*
Pin-Priority: 995
Package: *
Pin: origin haproxy.debian.net
Pin-Priority: -10
For me, pinning on both origin and version doesn't work. I
We have configured haproxy 1.5 and are using map-based hash (default).
For e.g. we have two backend servers. Server A and Server B.
Clients 1,2,3,4,5 will go to same backend.
For example
Client 1,2,3 are connected to Server A as per hash.
Server A is crashed.
haproxy shifts clients to Server B.
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 05:10:49PM +0200, Ghislain wrote:
Le 23/05/2014 15:23, Baptiste a écrit :
It is not provided by us (HAProxy.com) if this is what you mean.
Baptiste
yes that's what i meant. Thanks for both answer and thanks for the
product, and the packages !
In any case
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:54:18PM +0530, Jai Gupta wrote:
We have configured haproxy 1.5 and are using map-based hash (default).
For e.g. we have two backend servers. Server A and Server B.
Clients 1,2,3,4,5 will go to same backend.
For example
Client 1,2,3 are connected to Server A as
Something like this for haproxy will bring confident and prevent confusion
and questions.
http://nginx.org/en/linux_packages.html
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 05:10:49PM +0200, Ghislain wrote:
Le 23/05/2014 15:23, Baptiste a écrit
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:22:11PM +0300, pablo platt wrote:
Something like this for haproxy will bring confident and prevent confusion
and questions.
http://nginx.org/en/linux_packages.html
We're currently preparing something more or less like this for HAPEE
packages (the commercial,
Cómo Convertir el
Departamento de Com pras en un Centro de Ga nanciasBogotá 11 de junio,
2014
Si tiene la presión de reducir costos pero los
proveedores lo tienen contra la pared, necesita evaluar los inventarios y flujo
de materiales que afectan las ganancias de la empresa... Si realmente
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:39:01PM +0300, pablo platt wrote:
If you already have a repository for the commercial version, it'll be great
to have the free version hosted there too,
unless you want this service to be one of the distinguishing factors which
is understandable.
Personally, I think
❦ 23 mai 2014 20:22 +0300, pablo platt pablo.pl...@gmail.com :
Something like this for haproxy will bring confident and prevent
confusion and questions.
http://nginx.org/en/linux_packages.html
haproxy.debian.net is just a static page. We could host it on
haproxy.net if it helps (and apply
If you're having trouble viewing this email, please click here.
With our
Good plan. Will do it this way. If I use buffer_replace2() on the
header repeatedly from under http_res_get_intercept_rule() or
http_req_get_intercept_rule() it does not appear that it would cause
any problems - It is already being used from under
http_remove_header2() which is called from
Thank for reply Willy.
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:54:18PM +0530, Jai Gupta wrote:
We have configured haproxy 1.5 and are using map-based hash (default).
For e.g. we have two backend servers. Server A and Server B.
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 08:23:04AM +0530, Jai Gupta wrote:
What hash should we use in this case or is there any other configuration
that we should be using?
It's totally irrelevant to the hash here, because the hash is determinist
so it ensures that a given input always leads to the
37 matches
Mail list logo
