Attached is the patch that incorporates Thierry's fixes, and places
HTTP_RULE_RES_BADREQ where it belongs. I noticed another problem and
fixed it - if http-response/http-request was used with an invalid
action keyword, the error message failed to mention
replace-header/modify-header in the list of
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:30:58AM -0600, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> Willy:
>
> The concern is that in your change
>
> case HTTP_REQ_ACT_AUTH returns HTTP_RULE_RES_BADREQ, while
>
> case HTTP_REQ_ACT_REPLACE_HDR:
> case HTTP_REQ_ACT_MODIFY_HDR:
>
> return HTTP_RULE_RES_ABRT. Did you mean to return
Hello,
The purpose of this email you would like to connect your acquire customers from
the Water Industrie Professionnels Emails List to prompte your business or
Product and Acquire new customers, Increase retention or improve sales and
service efficiency,
We Provide you all Key Decision Maker
Willy:
The concern is that in your change
case HTTP_REQ_ACT_AUTH returns HTTP_RULE_RES_BADREQ, while
case HTTP_REQ_ACT_REPLACE_HDR:
case HTTP_REQ_ACT_MODIFY_HDR:
return HTTP_RULE_RES_ABRT. Did you mean to return
HTTP_RULE_RES_BADREQ in the case of REPLACE/MODIFY and keep
HTTP_REQ_ACT_AUTH the
Hi Dmitry,
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 06:58:02PM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
>
> On 13 2014 ??., at 20:00, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> >
> > Done! I've just pushed this. In the end I preferred not to apply this
> > principle to leastconn since there are some situations where leastconn
>
On 06/16/2014 03:19 PM, Julien Vehent wrote:
>
> On 2014-06-13 15:19, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> Emeric and Dirkjan at github are
>> finishing a basic support for OCSP Stapling which we'd prefer to merge
>> before the release in case we figure out that we need a smarter way to
>> configure the CA fil
On 13 июня 2014 г., at 20:00, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Done! I've just pushed this. In the end I preferred not to apply this
> principle to leastconn since there are some situations where leastconn
> farms can be highly unbalanced (after a server restart) so killing the
> delay could result in
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 08:42:47AM -0600, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> Thierry:
>
> Thanks. Some comments below...
>
> > I dont understand why the return code in "case HTTP_REQ_ACT_AUTH" line
> > 3361 in file proto_http.c is changed from HTTP_RULE_RES_ABRT to
> > HTTP_RULE_RES_BADREQ. Can you add commen
Thierry:
Thanks. Some comments below...
> I dont understand why the return code in "case HTTP_REQ_ACT_AUTH" line
> 3361 in file proto_http.c is changed from HTTP_RULE_RES_ABRT to
> HTTP_RULE_RES_BADREQ. Can you add comments or explain your modification
> in the commit text. It seems that is not c
HI,
i have two web servers, could you please help me to find a way to know the
status of real servers are up or down.
Thanks,
Muhammad Ammad Shah
On 16 Jun 2014 13:19, wrote:
>
> hi all
>
> i have the following situation:
> i have 4 real servers (two exchange2013 and 2 citrix) which should get
loadbalanced behind haproxy 1.4 (because this is the version shipped with
redhat).
> this backendservers should talk:
> exchanges: https, pop3, imap,
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 07:18:54 +0200
Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
>
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:24:43PM -0600, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> > Willy:
> >
> > I have made some revisions to the patch. Originally the use case
> > required only to be able to append to the header, so the modify-header
>
On 2014-06-13 15:19, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Emeric and Dirkjan at github are
finishing a basic support for OCSP Stapling which we'd prefer to merge
before the release in case we figure out that we need a smarter way to
configure the CA files now.
Did I read that right? Haproxy will have support f
Hi!
> Hi,
>
> Maybe a stupid question but if I download version 1.5-dev26, all the
> latest patches are present in this version or should I apply too?
No, dev26 was released May, 28th and doesn't contain any newer code.
To get more current code I suggest to use git, you just need 2 commands
hi all
i have the following situation:
i have 4 real servers (two exchange2013 and 2 citrix) which should get
loadbalanced behind haproxy 1.4 (because this is the version shipped with
redhat).
this backendservers should talk:
exchanges: https, pop3, imap, pop3s, imaps
citix: https
https shoul
Hi,
Maybe a stupid question but if I download version 1.5-dev26, all the
latest patches are present in this version or should I apply too?
Thanks for your help.
Kind regards,
Christophe
On 16/06/14 10:11, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:39:41AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
T
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:11:10AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:39:41AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > This helper is similar to addr_to_str but
> > tries to convert the port rather than the address
> > of a struct sockaddr_storage.
> >
> > This is in preparation for su
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:39:41AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> This helper is similar to addr_to_str but
> tries to convert the port rather than the address
> of a struct sockaddr_storage.
>
> This is in preparation for supporting
> an external agent check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
Than
18 matches
Mail list logo
