Shawn Heisey wrote on 02/06/2015 07:38 AM:
[CUT]
The current haproxy version implements almost every
performance-enhancing method mentioned in that video, as long as your
openssl is new enough.
It's on CentOS 6.. is that new enough?
We'll start testing different scenarios and see if we find
Hi,
I see tfo setting for bind directive but it isn't clear to me if HAProxy
will use TCP Fast Open towards the backend server.
Shall I assume that if client uses TCP Fast Open HAProxy will do the
same for server side?
Cheers,
Pavlos
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Tait Clarridge wrote on 02/05/2015 09:55 PM:
[CUT]
Just to check.. if I set nbproc to f.ex. 4 - then I understand I need to
define 4xstats.. and when I visit the webinterface.. I'll actually only
get stats from one of the 4 processes..
But we have ADMIN enabled for stats - so we can disable
On 06.02.2015 18:50, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 06.02.2015 14:13, Lukas Tribus wrote:
I tried to implement these recommendations but didn't seem to get
results I was expecting. How exactly does one reliably test that the
1-RTT handshake is actually working?
Enable TFO and announce
Title: Craquez vite pour cette offre EXCLU WEB et pour les SOLDES PRIX RONDS : 2, 4, 6 ...
Consulter la version en ligne Vous recevez ce message car votre adresse est enregistre dans la liste MBP.
Prix coup de cœur pour la Saint Valentin. Laissez-vous tenter Profitez des
soldes pour (vous) faire plaisir. En boutiques ou sur
Internet.
Pour visualiser ce message sur votre navigateur, consultez notre version en
ligne:
Nick Couchman schreef op 6-2-2015 om 23:52:
It's hard to figure out exactly how to phrase what I'm trying to do, but I essentially
need a configuration for HAProxy where I can pin the load-balancing of one
front-end port to another one, so that both go to the same back-end port. Here's what
C
- Original Message -
From: PiBa-NL piba.nl@gmail.com
To: Nick E Couchman nick.couch...@seakr.com, haproxy@formilux.org
Sent: Friday, February 6, 2015 4:06:18 PM
Subject: Re: haproxy and multiple ports
Nick Couchman schreef op 6-2-2015 om 23:52:
It's hard to figure out exactly
It's hard to figure out exactly how to phrase what I'm trying to do, but I
essentially need a configuration for HAProxy where I can pin the
load-balancing of one front-end port to another one, so that both go to the
same back-end port. Here's what I'm trying to do...I'm using HAProxy to
Hi Willy,
Yes, please send me the script.
Thanks!
-- Georges-Etienne
Le 2015-02-06 à 01:55, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu a écrit :
Hi Georges-Etienne,
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 09:10:25PM -0500, Georges-Etienne Legendre wrote:
Hi Willy,
I'm not sure how to document this leak. I don't
On 06/02/2015 11:19 πμ, Georges-Etienne Legendre wrote:
Hi Willy,
Yes, please send me the script.
Willy,
If it isn't against the policies of this ML to send attachments and the
script is few kilobytes size, could you please send it to the list?
Thanks,
Pavlos
signature.asc
Description:
Could you let us know why exactly you need to delay responses???
This is an API.
Unfortunately, the client behavior we are looking to address here cannot be
identified by client IP, ID, or anything else in the request. In fact, it
cannot be identified until the server has gone through
On 06.02.2015 07:38, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 2/5/2015 5:54 AM, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
Adding nbproc 4, improved performance of https from 511 req/s to 1296
req/s..
not quite an exponential scaling..
We tested with 8 cores and got 1328 req/s.. so it seems we're hitting
something else already
Hi, just subscribed to the iist, not had confirmation response yet, so i
hope this gets through and i can see responses.
i've got haproxy 1.5 installed and working, and it's working well so far.
i'm setting up a few servers to handle all our ftp, but in the meantime,
i'm using haproxy to proxy
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Alberto alberto-hap4...@ggsys.net wrote:
I have multiple back ends using different stacks.
All I need is to ensure that every client gets a unique
cookie. They don't need to be used for sticky sessions.
Pretty much all the examples I find are for hard coding,
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Chris k...@adobe.com wrote:
Hello,
We have some complex logic in our application that will at times determine
that the response to a specific query should be delayed. Currently this is
handled in the application with a short (~100ms) sleep.
We would like to
I tried to implement these recommendations but didn't seem to get
results I was expecting. How exactly does one reliably test that the
1-RTT handshake is actually working?
Enable TFO and announce http/1.1 via NPN and ALPN, that should
do it.
But your client will have to support all those
On 06.02.2015 14:13, Lukas Tribus wrote:
I tried to implement these recommendations but didn't seem to get
results I was expecting. How exactly does one reliably test that the
1-RTT handshake is actually working?
Enable TFO and announce http/1.1 via NPN and ALPN, that should
do it.
But
Hello,
Thank you for the repport. It is fixed. The patches will be
integrated in the 1.6 and 1.5 branches ASAP.
Thierry
On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 15:58:08 -0700
KJ Rasmussen kj_...@hotmail.com wrote:
Below is my haproxy config file, the contents of
both ACL files (Empty and we are only really
19 matches
Mail list logo
