Re: req.ssl_ver possible values

Hello Nick, On 2/17/2016 11:01 PM, Nick Ramirez wrote: > After reading through the documentation on the req.ssl_ver ACL and its > possible values, I still don't fully understand the possible values that > it might return. > > From the docs, SSL ver 3.0 will return 3 for req.ssl_ver and TLS

req.ssl_ver possible values

After reading through the documentation on the req.ssl_ver ACL and its possible values, I still don't fully understand the possible values that it might return. >From the docs, SSL ver 3.0 will return 3 for req.ssl_ver and TLS 1.0 will return 3.1. Are those the only possible values? Or would

Re: Round robin w/o closing backend connections?

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:46:17AM -0500, CJ Ess wrote: > So lets say that I don't want HAProxy to close the connections to my > backend servers - they can stay active and be available for keepalives - > but I do want every request from the frontend to go to a different backend > via round robin.

Re: Sticky-tables by 2x query-strings...

This is a follow up to my former question regarding the ability to do `src` based connection persistence / sticky tables subject to an additional rule for two (2x) query-strings where present: 1 - a targeted server instance (over-rules all else) 2 - user-id (used where present or is the only

Feature Request for log stdout ...

Hi. how difficult is it to be able to add "log stdout;" to haproxy? I ask because in some PaaS environment is it difficult to setup a dedicated user yust for haproxy. It fits also a little bit better to http://12factor.net/logs BR Aleks

Votre coupon pour 1 mois gratuit de lentilles progressives !

Cliquez ici si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement

Votre coupon pour 1 mois gratuit de lentilles progressives !

Cliquez ici si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement

Votre coupon pour 1 mois gratuit de lentilles progressives !

Cliquez ici si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement

Re: [PATCH 2/4] MINOR: mailers, cfg: make time available for connection attempts to mailserver configurable with new 'timeout mail ' setting

Hi Pieter, for this one, could you please add an entry in the doc (configuration.txt) ? I've re-adjusted the commit message already, you can update this patch. Thanks, Willy >From f97319506e74e912cb77fa35a3e9d1618b8130f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pieter Baauw Date: