Besoin d'une femme de ménage ?

Afficher la version web. (http://trk.mix.jajaris.fr/view/xbz-877RB.php) | Annuler votre abonnement. (http://trk.mix.jajaris.fr/usb/xbz-877RB.php) | Signaler comme courrier indésirable. (mailto:ab...@dgcnit.fr) Besoin d'une femme de ménage?

RE: Haproxy stats page returns 503 error

Hi, Following is configuration for stats in haproxy.cfg listen stats_proxy myvm:5544 mode http option httpclose option abortonclose # enable web-stats at /haproxy?stats stats enable # force HTTP Auth to view stats stats refresh 60s

Re: gpc0_rate computing incorrectly with peer replication turned in [in 1.6.3]

I believe that there used to be server IDs in here, but no longer. Peering in 1.5 seems to just ignore it, but 1.6 does something strange under load. Still haven't reproduced in a test environment, though. On Wednesday, February 24, 2016, Bryan Talbot wrote: > On Wed, Feb

Re: gpc0_rate computing incorrectly with peer replication turned in [in 1.6.3]

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 6:05 PM, James Brown wrote: > > We use a gpc0 counter for rate-limiting certain requests in our application. It was working fine with 1.5.14, but as soon as I upgraded to 1.6.3, we started seeing the gpc0_rate value go crazy – it's currently showing

gpc0_rate computing incorrectly with peer replication turned in [in 1.6.3]

We use a gpc0 counter for rate-limiting certain requests in our application. It was working fine with 1.5.14, but as soon as I upgraded to 1.6.3, we started seeing the gpc0_rate value go crazy – it's currently showing values in the hundreds of thousands when the underlying gpc0 counter has *never*

Migrating haproxy 1.5 monitor-uri

I need to migrate to a different URL for our haproxy health checks, and it would be really helpful if I could respond to multiple URLs as part of the transition, or could create an empty 200 response.

stick table replication

>From the docs, it looks like stick tables entries are only replicated when they store a server-id. This makes sense if stick tables are only used for sticky-sessions shared across multiple proxy instances. Is there a way to get stick table replication to occur when the stick table is not used

Re: acl's re-calculated after reqrep ?

Hi, The ACL are implicitly recalculated because they are never precalculated. They are calculated each time that the condition result is required. Thierry On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:44:38 -0700 Jim Freeman wrote: > [ using 1.6.3 on Debian8 ] > > Are acl's re-calculated after

Re: SNI configuration

Hi, Op 24-2-2016 om 12:13 schreef Alexey Vlasov: Hi, To enable HTTPS access only for sites with issued certificate, for other sites HTTPS access should be unavailable. And preferably I would like to disable the approval procedure (handshake SSL) for those "uncertificated" hosts, Have you

calling from China: cnc machining services

Dear Sir or Madam, Good day. We have obtained you information from Google that you are in the market for machining services . We are a machining shop from China (mainland) that specializing in the cnc machining,cnc milling,cnc turning,lasering with high quality, competitive price and the

SNI configuration

Hi, I have a task: I have to make a HTTPS protocol support using the SNI extension for websites on my virtual hosting. My simplest working configuration looks like this: == frontend http-in bind111.111.111.111:80 errorfile 408

Re: Using operators in ACLs

> On 24 Feb 2016, at 14:07, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 01:36:39PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: >> I do have "mode http" (I intentionally put it here with a comment). >> Will it work only for tcp-mode frontend? >> Or should I use tcp-request for tcp frontend

Re: Using operators in ACLs

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 01:36:39PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > I do have "mode http" (I intentionally put it here with a comment). > Will it work only for tcp-mode frontend? > Or should I use tcp-request for tcp frontend and http-request for http > frontend? Both tcp-request and

Re: Using operators in ACLs

> On 24 Feb 2016, at 01:02, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Dmitry, > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 05:58:47PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I want to define ACL which will evaluate to true if a current number of >> connections to a particular backend is greater than a

Re: vrrp stateful failover

[...] *snip* > > The scenario is; > > > > web server that we need to get a large file from, a pair of haproxy load > > balancers in front of it in a master/backup configuration, with keepalived > > and conntrackd for fun. > > > > If a failover of a master to backup of haproxy occurs would we

Re: vrrp stateful failover

Hi Alex, See comments inserted below... On Wednesday, 2016-02-24 at 04:09:20 PM, Alex Needham scribbled: > Hi > > The scenario is; > > web server that we need to get a large file from, a pair of haproxy load > balancers in front of it in a master/backup configuration, with keepalived > and

Re: vrrp stateful failover

Hi, this is sort-of speculative, but it would surprised me if the gist of it wasn't correct: conntrackd synchs firewall state, but it doesn't synch tcp state, and it can't do anything to haproxy to make a haproxy instance think it already has an established connection. It's an interesting