Le guide pour réduire ses impôts
[ ]( http://r.email-mieux-depenser.com/5t9f8wg31awhcvd.html ) [ Réduire ses impôts ]( http://r.email-mieux-depenser.com/5t9f8wg3tqwhcvd.html ) [ pendant 6, 9 ou 12 ans ]( http://r.email-mieux-depenser.com/5t9f8wg4m6whcvd.html ) [ C'est possible ! ]( http://r.email-mieux-depenser.com/5t9f8wg5emwhcvd.html ) [ En savoir + ]( http://r.email-mieux-depenser.com/5t9f8wg672whcvd.html ) [ ]( http://r.email-mieux-depenser.com/5t9f8wg6ziwhcvd.html ) [ O € d’impôt pendant 6 à 12 ans tout en devenant propriétaire ]( http://r.email-mieux-depenser.com/5t9f8wg7rywhcvd.html ) [ Demandez votre simulation gratuite et recevez le guide Loi Pinel ]( http://r.email-mieux-depenser.com/5t9f8wg8kewhcvd.html ) [ - Explications - Conseils pratiques - Exemples ]( http://r.email-mieux-depenser.com/5t9f8wg9cuwhcvd.html ) [ ]( http://r.email-mieux-depenser.com/5t9f8wga5awhcvd.html ) [ >> Votre simulation et guide complet en 30 secondes << ]( http://r.email-mieux-depenser.com/1xr52ytd2lawhcvd.html )
Website maintenance
Addressed To Greetings For the Day, Hope all is going well! I am Bhushan, SEO Professional. Are you looking to increase ROI through Your Website Maintenance: www.formilux.org You got a nice website but why are you missing out Over Search engine optimization and social media management. The research released by major online research firms confirm search engine as the best source of getting information and making a purchase decision for most the people and this trend is continuously growing. We are a small bunch of Professionals who are experts in website optimization, designing, SMM, Search Engine Marketing and Online Business Optimization. We will be glad to assist you by offering our services. Give us a chance to see what we can do for Your Website Maintenance and business. We won't take you through binding contract unless you are absolutely happy with our work We will be glad to hear from you if you got any requirements for Your Website Maintenance. We will share all our methods of promotions, all our client testimonials, service fee, past work details etc for your reference. We have expertise in the following areas:- . Online Marketing, . Website maintenance, . Easy Web Solution, . Web Site Promotions. . Flash Website Design I look forward to hear from you! Kind Regards, Bhushan SEO Professional Karol Bagh New Delhi (India) Kindly reply back with "unsubscribe" to us if you don't wish to receive any emails from us in future.
Re: Issue with configuration reload and frontend certificates
Hi Lukas by the way I found this very strange, however you are right, it seems that pacemaker left old haproxy instances alive (I moved the service between the nodes to simulate a shutdown on one node) - I didn’t noticed this, as it should kill every instance on one node before starting them on another node. after moving the resource to another node, killing the survived instances and moving the service back to the node everything seems working properly. sorry for the wrong report cheers Marco > On 09 Sep 2016, at 12:31, Lukas Tribus wrote: > > Ciao Marco, > > > I assume the old process did not get the signal and continues to serve > requests with the old configuration. > > Can you confirm the number of haproxy processes running is more than you > expect? Are you using nbproc or single process mode (the latter is the > default)? > > > Does the PID file contain the correct PID? > > > If the old haproxy instance is not getting the signal it will continue to > serve requests and the kernel will load-balance between the old and the new > instance, leading to the behavior you are describing. > > > > We really need an no-reuseport knob to confirm those kinds of issues... > > > Regarding the actual problem, I would suggest to upgrade to latest stable > release 1.6.9 first of all. Then we can actually start troubleshooting, but > there are important bugfixes in those 4 releases. > > > > cheers, > > lukas > >
Re: Issue with configuration reload and frontend certificates
Ciao Marco, I assume the old process did not get the signal and continues to serve requests with the old configuration. Can you confirm the number of haproxy processes running is more than you expect? Are you using nbproc or single process mode (the latter is the default)? Does the PID file contain the correct PID? If the old haproxy instance is not getting the signal it will continue to serve requests and the kernel will load-balance between the old and the new instance, leading to the behavior you are describing. We really need an no-reuseport knob to confirm those kinds of issues... Regarding the actual problem, I would suggest to upgrade to latest stable release 1.6.9 first of all. Then we can actually start troubleshooting, but there are important bugfixes in those 4 releases. cheers, lukas
Re: [PATCH] New DNS parser
On 08/09/2016 09:50 μμ, Baptiste wrote: > Hi all, > > Please find in attachment 10 patches to cover the following new topic in > HAProxy: > > 1. a new DNS parser, which stores the DNS response into a DNS structure, > instead > of manipulating a buffer. > => it doesn't add any feature by itself, but it will make DNS consumer tasks > much > easier when using DNS responses > > 2. when the DNS response finishes with a CNAME, now HAProxy sends a new query, > changing the query type (from to A or A to ) > > I heavily tested the code, but I'd like more people to test it in their own > environment. > > We can now move forward on the next big development: filling servers in a > backend > based on records read in a DNS responses. > > Conrad: I have a quick and dirty and not finished patch to read and store SRV > records. If you want to use it for your own dev, please let me know. > > Baptiste I'm also super excited about this patch set and the fact it will lead to an easy and fast integration with docker world. Thanks a lot Baptiste for your hard work, Pavlos signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[no subject]
Hi Customer, If you can not see the description below, please click here. 如無法閱讀以下的內容，請按此.To learn more, please visit www.printing100.com. 想了解多D請到www.printing100.com 9月啦,系時候要印月曆.利是封啦! 我司有多款訂制月曆.利是封選擇, 可適合不同客人訂制要求.9月1日前落單即可享有9.5折優惠！ 座檯月曆年曆咭Red pocketDesktop calendarCalendar card 利是封 Chinese calendar 福字月曆 Desktop calendar座檯月曆 Chinese calendar福字月曆 Red pocket利是封 本司提供多個款式掛曆檯曆。既美觀又耐用。客戶可以通過自助設計系統可以自行上傳圖片和修改圖片的位置，自己動手，自己當設計師，當一把設計癮，設計出特色檯挂曆，按客戶要求可加公司名字，LOGO，便於公司派發，使用新一年新氣象，月曆當然必須辭舊迎新，多種款式、多種工藝的月曆可讓客戶多種選擇。色彩華麗，瑞氣滿盈，寓意吉祥。我司推出自訂特色利是封，新年利是封, 結婚回禮封,用途多多，少至私人用(200-300個)，多至企業推廣(1000-5000個).可選擇彩色印刷或傳統花紋紙加燙金效果。歡迎 諮詢Hot Line :82007559Email：sa...@printing100.com 其他產品資訊 If our promotional email have causing you any disturbance, please email(promot...@printing100.com) and acknowledge us for cancelation of the mailing list. 如此郵件對閣下帶來騷擾, 請以EMAIL(promot...@printing100.com) 通知我們
[PATCH] Fix OSX compilation errors
Hi, The following really trivial patch fixes compilation issues on OSX (El Capitan at least). Kind regards, D. 0001-BUG-MINOR-fix-osx-compilation-errors.patch Description: Binary data
Re: [PATCH] New DNS parser
Hi Baptiste, I'm super excited :) Unfortunately, I'll be on vacation for three weeks, beginning this weekend, so I won't be able to provide any feedback before I get back. But I will give it test ride immediately after. Thanks so much, Conrad On 09/08/2016 09:50 PM, Baptiste wrote: > Hi all, > > Please find in attachment 10 patches to cover the following new topic in > HAProxy: > > 1. a new DNS parser, which stores the DNS response into a DNS structure, > instead of manipulating a buffer. > => it doesn't add any feature by itself, but it will make DNS consumer > tasks much easier when using DNS responses > > 2. when the DNS response finishes with a CNAME, now HAProxy sends a new > query, changing the query type (from to A or A to ) > > I heavily tested the code, but I'd like more people to test it in their own > environment. > > We can now move forward on the next big development: filling servers in a > backend based on records read in a DNS responses. > > Conrad: I have a quick and dirty and not finished patch to read and store > SRV records. If you want to use it for your own dev, please let me know. > > Baptiste > -- Conrad Hoffmann Traffic Engineer SoundCloud Ltd. | Rheinsberger Str. 76/77, 10115 Berlin, Germany Managing Director: Alexander Ljung | Incorporated in England & Wales with Company No. 6343600 | Local Branch Office | AG Charlottenburg | HRB 110657B
Issue with configuration reload and frontend certificates
Hi all, I’m facing this weird behaviour so I report you for further investigation. I’m using haproxy 1.6.5 I’m trying to automate X.509 certificate replacement of haproxy frontends while they expires, so I wrote a script that simply generate the new PEM and issue a reload to haproxy. Reload command the script give is haproxy -f /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg -p /var/run/haproxy.pid -sf $(cat /var/run/haproxy.pid) now the weird thing: it seems that haproxy is somehow caching the old certificate: this is what happens if I connect from another host: (I used 2 different certificates to make it evident: the old one was *.itc4u.ch, the new one is apache-2.prod.itc4u.local - but I suppose this should happen even when replacing an expiring certificate with a new one) openssl s_client -connect apache-2.prod.itc4u.local:443 CONNECTED(0003) depth=2 C = US, O = DigiCert Inc, OU = www.digicert.com, CN = DigiCert Global Root CA verify return:1 depth=1 C = US, O = DigiCert Inc, CN = DigiCert SHA2 Secure Server CA verify return:1 depth=0 C = CH, ST = TI, L = Pregassona, O = ITC4u Sagl, CN = *.itc4u.ch after a few executions openssl s_client -connect apache-2.prod.itc4u.local:443 CONNECTED(0003) depth=1 O = ITC4U.LOCAL, CN = Certificate Authority verify return:1 depth=0 O = ITC4U.LOCAL, CN = apache-2.prod.itc4u.local and after other executions again openssl s_client -connect apache-2.prod.itc4u.local:443 CONNECTED(0003) depth=2 C = US, O = DigiCert Inc, OU = www.digicert.com, CN = DigiCert Global Root CA verify return:1 depth=1 C = US, O = DigiCert Inc, CN = DigiCert SHA2 Secure Server CA verify return:1 depth=0 C = CH, ST = TI, L = Pregassona, O = ITC4u Sagl, CN = *.itc4u.ch this seems to be randomly happening The more weird thing is that it seems to happen even if I stop haproxy and start it again As I’m using a clustered environment (but it is an active/hot standby), e even checked haproxy log files and each time I receive a reply from the same cluster node (that actually is the only active one) I get it logged, so I’m absolutely sure replies always comes from the same node In order to ensure that is not something related to openssl s_client, I tried with firefox, and got exactly the same behaviour Kind regards Marco Carcano
